DUAN Fujun, ZHANG Dan, XU Xianrong. Effects of hyperbaric oxygenations in treatment of noise induced hearing loss in China: A meta-analysis[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2021, 42(7): 761-766. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2021.07.016
Citation: DUAN Fujun, ZHANG Dan, XU Xianrong. Effects of hyperbaric oxygenations in treatment of noise induced hearing loss in China: A meta-analysis[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2021, 42(7): 761-766. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2021.07.016

Effects of hyperbaric oxygenations in treatment of noise induced hearing loss in China: A meta-analysis

Funds: Supported by the Foundation of Chinese Air Force Logistics Department (BKJ10J054); Standard Formulation Project of PLA Logistics Department (BKJ19B053)
More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    XU Xianrong. Email: xuxianrongkz@sina.com

  • Received Date: February 10, 2020
  • Available Online: October 18, 2021
  •   Background  Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a slow progressive sensorineural deafness which can cause headache, dizziness, insomnia, hypertension, etc by the development of disease. Due to no effective treatment, it will seriously affect flight safety.
      Objective  To evaluate the effects of hyperbaric oxygenations (HBO) in treating NIHL, and provide more effective guidance for clinical treatment.
      Methods  Randomized controlled trials of HBO-treated NIHL (the experimental group was given HBO for intervention while the control group was not, both groups could be treated with other drugs or intervention) were retrieved from databases of CKNI, Wanfang, VIP and PubMed. The methodological quality assessment on included literature was processed by Jadad quality scoring method, and RevMan 5.3.0 was adopted to conduct Meta-analysis.
      Results  A total of 4 clinical randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, including 284 patients (142 cases in experimental group and 142 cases in control group). Results of meta-analysis indicated that after HBO treatment, there was a statistically significant improvement of NIHL patients’ pure ton auditory threshold 0.5 kHz [MD=-5.95, 95%CI(-7.14 - -4.74), P<0.01], 1 kHz [MD=-4.45, 95% CI (-5.34 - -3.56), P<0.01], 2 kHz [MD=-4.58, 95% CI (-5.69 - -3.47), P<0.01], 4 kHz [MD=-11.75, 95% CI (-13.73 - -9.77)]. No adverse reaction was reported.
      Conclusion  HBO treatment in NIHL patients can reduce the PTA threshold at 0.5 k, 1 k, 2 k, 4kHz without side effects. However, the PTA threshold reduction is need to be verified by high-quality clinical studies.
  • [1]
    常耀明, 张舒, 苏洪余. 航空航天医学全书[M]. 西安: 第四军医大学出版社, 2013.
    [2]
    朱蕊泉,黄丽丽,谢春姣,等. 自我管理模式对职业性噪声聋患者心理健康的影响[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援,2018,36(4): 312-314.
    [3]
    张霞,苗丹民,郭小朝,等. 歼击机噪声对人听力及工效的影响[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志,2005,16(4): 253-257. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6239.2005.04.004
    [4]
    张红蕾,李大鹏,李佳,等. 飞行人员高频听力损失及言语识别能力跟踪研究[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2019,27(4): 350-353. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2019.04.002
    [5]
    马璐,周长明,张雪峰,等. 活性氧在噪声性聋中的作用机制及治疗进展[J]. 临床误诊误治,2019,32(3): 113-116. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2019.03.025
    [6]
    胡潇红,宁荣霞. 突发性耳聋的发病机制与治疗康复现状[J]. 中国康复,2020,35(9): 496-500.
    [7]
    王少帅,米英姿,杨菲,等. 高压氧处理对脑动脉粥样硬化大鼠炎性因子及氧化应激水平的抑制作用[J]. 中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志,2020,27(5): 566-569. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311847-20200530-00232
    [8]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生与计划生育委员会. 职业性噪声聋诊断标准: GBZ49-2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
    [9]
    孙力艳. 高压氧治疗40例职业性噪声聋患者效果观察[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2016,10(8): 95-96.
    [10]
    付艳荣. 高压氧治疗职业性噪声聋患者的疗效观察[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志,2016,3(16): 88.
    [11]
    吕璐. 高压氧治疗52例职业性噪声聋患者的效果观察[J]. 医药前沿,2018,8(5): 14-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1752.2018.05.019
    [12]
    王娜. 高压氧治疗职业性噪声聋患者的疗效观察[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(7): 12-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2018.07.006
    [13]
    邓森林,田春龙,蒋军,等. 噪声性聋药物防治研究[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2018,26(5): 543-546. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2018.05.022
    [14]
    熊巍,徐先荣,刘玉华,等. 改装体检直升机与歼击机飞行员听力分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2011,19(6): 534-536. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2011.06.014
    [15]
    段付军,张丹,徐先荣. 直升机和歼击机飞行员听力损失特征分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2020,41(1): 21-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2020.01.006
    [16]
    周珊宇,温贤忠,李旭东,等. 广东省2011—2015年新发职业性噪声聋流行病学特征[J]. 中国职业医学,2017,44(6): 737-739.
    [17]
    刘静,李梅莉,杨雪莹,等. 天津市2016年职业性噪声聋监测情况分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2017,44(23): 4252-4255.
    [18]
    王秋菊,李倩,刘岩,等. 新型低压氧舱治疗低频波动性感音神经性听力损失的临床前瞻性研究[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2012,10(2): 136-143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2012.02.001
    [19]
    陈令江,张洪霞,王青云,等. 新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病听力损伤的高危因素分析及早期干预[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(12): 36-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5110.2016.12.018
    [20]
    蔡润茁,马云胜,左中夫. 叶酸缺乏导致小鼠听力障碍机制的实验研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2017,24(12): 620-624.
    [21]
    中国人民解放军总医院第六医学中心. 中华医学会高压氧分会关于“高压氧治疗适应证与禁忌证”的共识(2018版)[J]. 中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志,2019,26(1): 1-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-6906.2019.01.001
    [22]
    彭小岭,陈胡萍,谢清明,等. 高压氧治疗突发性聋伴耳鸣随机对照试验的系统评价[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2018,15(5): 25-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2018.05.007
    [23]
    高明杰,刘海霞. 睡眠管理对职业性噪声聋患者焦虑情绪及睡眠质量的影响[J]. 世界睡眠医学杂志,2019,6(8): 1164-1165.
    [24]
    Chandrasekhar SS,Tsai Do BS,Schwartz SR,et al. Clinical practice guideline:sudden hearing loss(update)[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2019,161(1_Suppl): S1-S45. doi: 10.1177/0194599819859885
    [25]
    Radi S,Benke G,Schaafsma F,et al. Compensation claims for occupational noise induced hearing loss between 1998 and 2008:yearly incidence rates and trends in older workers[J]. Aust N Z J Public Health,2016,40(2): 181-185. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12460
    [26]
    中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会. 突发性聋的诊断和治疗指南(2005年,济南)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(5): 325. doi: 10.3760/j.issn:1673-0860.2006.05.003

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (98) PDF downloads (16) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return