肺鳞癌三级淋巴结构特征及其对预后的影响

Characteristics of tertiary lymphatic structures in lung squamous cell carcinoma and their impact on prognosis

  • 摘要:
      背景  肿瘤微环境内三级淋巴结构(tertiary lymphoid structure,TLS)具有招募、活化和增殖T淋巴细胞、B淋巴细胞的功能,是肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(tumor infiltrating lymphocyte, TIL) 的重要来源,已被证明与多种癌症的预后有关。
      目的  探究肺鳞癌(lung squamous cell carcinoma,LUSC)患者组织内TLS特征及其对预后的影响。
      方法  回顾性分析2010 - 2022年解放军总医院和解放军第一四八医院42例经根治性手术切除且病理确认LUSC患者的临床资料和病理切片,分析LUSC病理组织切片TIL和TLS特征与LUSC临床病理特征的关系及预后。
      结果  42例中男性40例,女性2例,中位年龄65(范围:50 ~ 81)岁;未经新辅助治疗24例,接受新辅助免疫治疗18例。QuPath软件检测发现:新辅助免疫治疗患者相比未经新辅助治疗患者的TLS所含免疫细胞显著增多。TLS与临床指标关系分析中发现:新辅助治疗组较未经新辅助治疗组的TLS密度、圆形/椭圆形TLS密度以及最大TLS面积更高;N分期不同,圆形/椭圆形TLS密度不同,高细胞密度TLS密度不同;年龄越大,最大TLS面积更大;差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经新辅助免疫治疗的LUSC患者免疫应答分析显示:缓解深度≥60%患者较缓解深度<60%患者TIL密度、圆形/椭圆形TLS密度、TLS中位面积、低细胞密度TLS 密度、非规则TLS密度更高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。未经新辅助治疗组22例患者生存分析显示,圆形/椭圆形TLS密度高组相较于密度低组具有相对更好的预后中位总生存期(median overall survival,mOS):53.5个月 vs 25.0个月,P=0.069,最大TLS面积高组相较于面积低组具有相对更好的预后mOS:50.0个月 vs 25.0个月,P=0.074,P值接近0.05。
      结论  接受新辅助免疫治疗者较未接受者、免疫治疗应答好者较应答差者具有更高的TLS特征,TLS密度、圆形/椭圆形TLS密度和最大TLS面积高可能预示预后良好。

     

    Abstract:
      Background  Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) within the tumor microenvironment (TME) have the function of recruiting, activating and proliferating T and B lymphocytes, and are an important source of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which have been shown to be related to the prognosis of many cancers.
      Objective  To investigate the characteristics of intra-tissue TLSs in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and their impact on prognosis.
      Methods  To retrospectively analyze the clinical data and pathological sections of 42 patients with pathologically confirmed LUSC who underwent radical surgical resection at the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army and the 148th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army from 2010 to 2022, and to analyze the relationship between the TILs and TLSs features of LUSC pathology and the clinicopathological features of LUSC, as well as the prognosis of the patients.
      Results  Of the 42 cases, 40 were male and 2 were female, with a median age of 65 (range 50-81) years; 24 were without neoadjuvant therapy and 18 received neoadjuvant immunotherapy. QuPath software revealed that TLS contained significantly more immune cells in patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy compared to those without neoadjuvant therapy. In the analysis of the relationship between TLS and clinical factors, it was found that the neoadjuvant group had a higher density of TLS, a higher density of round/elliptical TLS, and a higher maximum TLS area than the group without neoadjuvant treatment; depending on the N stage, the density of round/elliptical TLS varies, as does the density of high-cell-density TLS; higher age was associated with larger areas of maximum TLS; all differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Analysis of the immune response in patients with LUSC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy showed that patients with deepness of response ≥60% had a higher density of TILs, round/elliptical TLS, median area of TLS, low-cell-density TLS, and irregular TLS than patients with deepness of response <60%, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Survival analysis of 22 patients in the group without neoadjuvant therapy showed that higher density of round/elliptical TLS had a relatively better prognosis compared to the lower density group (median overall survival mOS: 53.5 months vs 25.0 months, P=0.069), the group with higher area of maximum TLS had a relatively better prognosis compared with the group with lower area (mOS: 50.0 months vs 25.0 months, P=0.074), with a P value close to 0.05.
      Conclusion  Those who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy had greater characteristics of TLS than those who did not, and those who responded well to immunotherapy had greater characteristics of TLS than those who responded poorly, and higher density of TLS, higher density of rounded/elliptical TLS, and a larger area of maximum TLS may be indicative of a favorable prognosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回