术前短期应用胺碘酮对持续性房颤导管消融术效果的影响

Effect of short-term preoperative use of amiodarone on efficacy of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

  • 摘要:
    背景 持续性房颤导管消融术难度大,成功率较低,胺碘酮能够减轻心房重构,因此部分术者尝试通过术前应用胺碘酮来简化手术过程,提高手术成功率,但这种辅助治疗手段的疗效尚不明确。
    目的 探讨术前短期应用胺碘酮对持续性房颤导管消融术效果的影响。
    方法 选取2019年1月 - 2021年12月于解放军总医院心血管病医学部接受导管消融术的持续性房颤患者,根据术前胺碘酮的使用情况分为胺碘酮组和对照组,胺碘酮组术前口服胺碘酮治疗至手术前1 d,总疗程为7 d,服用剂量为0.2 g/次,3次/d;对照组术前不接受胺碘酮治疗。所有患者首先行肺静脉隔离(pulmonary vein isolation,PVI),如患者能自行或电复律转复窦性心律,则行基质标测消融,即对低电压区原则上行均质化消融,必要时附加线性消融;如患者不能转复窦性心律,则行步进式消融,即直接附加左房顶部、二尖瓣峡部线性消融及复杂碎裂电位(complex fractionated atrial electrograms,CFAEs)消融。患者术中如出现典型三尖瓣峡部依赖房扑,则行三尖瓣峡部线性消融。
    结果 胺碘酮组53例,男42例,女11例,平均年龄(59.6 ± 9.5)岁;对照组132例,男109例,女23例,平均年龄(58.3 ± 10.4)岁。两组间除估计肾小球滤过率(P=0.003)、脑利钠肽水平(P<0.001)和既往应用β受体阻滞剂情况(P=0.020)外,其余基线资料差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。胺碘酮组PVI后转复窦性心律的成功率显著高于对照组(94.3% vs 79.5%,P=0.014),窦律下基质标测消融与步进式消融相比,附加线性消融(不含三尖瓣峡部线)及低电压区(含CFAEs)均质化消融的比例更低(9.7% vs 80.0%,P<0.001;7.1% vs 36.7%,P<0.001)。胺碘酮组与对照组术后12个月复发率(28.3% vs 28.8%,Log-rank P=0.966)及空白期(3个月内)复发率(20.4% vs 21.2%,Log-rank P=0.713)差异无统计学意义。
    结论 术前短期应用胺碘酮不能减少持续性房颤导管消融术后复发,但能提高PVI后转复窦性心律的成功率,窦律下基质标测消融相较于步进式消融手术过程更简单。

     

    Abstract:
    Background The catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation is difficult and has a relatively low success rate, amiodarone can reduce atrial remodeling, so some operators have attempted to simplify the procedure and improve success rate by using amiodarone as an adjunct treatment before operation, but the efficacy of this approach is unclear.
    Objective To investigate the effect of short-term preoperative use of amiodarone on the efficacy of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Methods Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent catheter ablation at the Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were included, patients were divided into amiodarone group and control group based on the use of amiodarone before operation, the amiodarone group received oral amiodarone treatment until the day before operation, the total course of treatment was 7 days, and the administration method was 0.2g, three times daily, however the control group did not receive amiodarone treatment before operation. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as the first step of treatment, if they converted to sinus rhythm spontaneously or by cardioversion, they underwent substrate-based ablation, in principle, areas with low-voltage were homogenized and eliminated, linear ablation would be done if necessary; if they did not convert to sinus rhythm, they underwent stepwise ablation, additional linear ablation of the left atrial roof and the mitral isthmus as well as ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) were performed. Linear ablation of the tricuspid isthmus was performed in patients if typical isthmus-dependent atrial flutter occurred during the operation.
    Results There were 53 cases (42 males and 11 females) with mean age of (59.6 ± 9.5) years in the amiodarone group, another 132 cases (109 males and 23 females) with mean age of (58.3 ± 10.4) years in the control group. Except for estimated glomerular filtration rate (P=0.003), brain natriuretic peptide (P<0.001) and previous use of beta-blockers (P=0.020), there were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The success rate of amiodarone group who converted to sinus rhythm after pulmonary vein isolation was significantly higher than that of the control group (94.3% vs 79.5%, P=0.014),compared with stepwise ablation, the number of additional linear ablation (excluding the tricuspid isthmus line) and low-voltage area (including CFAEs) homogenization ablation in substrate-based ablation under sinus rhythm was fewer (9.7% vs 80.0%, P<0.001; 7.1% vs 36.7%, P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the 12-month recurrence rate (28.3% vs 28.8%, log-rank P=0.966) and blank-period recurrence rate (20.4% vs 21.2%, log-rank P=0.713) between the amiodarone group and the control group.
    Conclusion Short-term preoperative administration of amiodarone does not reduce recurrence after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation, but it can improve the success rate of converting to sinus rhythm after PVI, and the procedure of substrate-based ablation under sinus rhythm is simpler than that of step-wise ablation.

     

/

返回文章
返回