虚拟现实下空军飞行员心理旋转测试方法及正常参考值的研究

Establishment of reference values of mental rotation test for air force pilots based on virtual reality

  • 摘要:
    背景 近年来虚拟现实的发展为了解人类空间认知能力提供了新的技术手段。
    目的 建立空军飞行员虚拟现实下心理旋转测试方法及正常参考值范围,为评估空军飞行员空间视觉化能力提供新方法。
    方法 选取2022年3 - 10月在空军特色医学中心进行体检的空军飞行员,进行虚拟现实下字母R的旋转测试。采用飞行员技术水平评定量表作为测量效标,记录测试的反应时间,并以95% CI建立其正常参考值范围。同时按年龄、飞行时间及机型进行分组,比较不同组别反应时间。
    结果 131例飞行员均为男性,年龄(30.52 ± 6.84)岁。R字母旋转测试反应时间的参考值范围为14.00 ~ 29.00 s。22 ~ 28岁年龄组飞行员的反应时间显著低于35岁以上年龄组飞行员(P<0.05)。飞行时间<1 000 h组飞行员的反应时间显著低于飞行时间1 000 ~ 2 000 h组及>2 000 h组的飞行员(P<0.05)。不同机型飞行员的反应时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.675)。相关性分析显示,全部受试者飞行技术水平量表得分与反应时间呈弱负相关(r=-0.242,P=0.005);全部受试者年龄、飞行时间与反应时间呈弱正相关(r=0.282,P=0.001;r=0.324,P<0.001)。
    结论 本研究建立了一种新的心理旋转测试方法及正常参考值范围,为评估飞行员空间视觉化能力及航空医学鉴定提供了客观参考依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Background In recent years, the developments of virtual reality technology have provided a new technological tool for understanding human spatial cognitive abilities.
    Objective To establish reference values of mental rotation test for air force pilots based on virtual reality and provide a new method for evaluating their spatial visualization ability. Methods Air force pilots who underwent medical examination in Air Force Specialized Medical Center from March to October in 2022 were selected. They received R letter rotation test based on virtual reality. The pilot flight ability evaluation scale was used as a criterion of test validity. Their reaction time was recorded and the normal reference range was defined as 95% CI. And the difference in reaction time was compared between different age groups, different flight time groups and different air force pilot types.
    Results Totally 131 male pilots aged (30.52 ± 6.84) years old were enrolled. The reference range of reaction time in R letter rotation test was 14 to 29 seconds. Pilots in 22 - 28 years old age group had significantly slower reaction time than those in more than 35 years old group (P<0.05). Pilots with less than 1 000 hours of flight time had significantly slower reaction time than those in the other two groups (P=0.015; P=0.002). There was no significant difference in reaction time between different air force pilot types (P=0.675). Pilots’ scale scores were negatively correlated with their reaction time (r=-0.242, P=0.005), while their age and flight time were positively correlated with their reaction time (r=0.282, P=0.001; r=0.324, P<0.001).
    Conclusion This study establishes a new test method and reference range for mental rotation test, which provides an objective reference for spatial visualization ability and medical assessment.

     

/

返回文章
返回