特异性抑制剂普拉替尼经治的伴有RET融合突变的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌的真实世界疗效和安全性分析

Real-word clinical outcomes and safety analysis of the specific inhibitor pratinib in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with RET fusion mutations

  • 摘要:
    背景  我国非小细胞肺癌(Non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者转染重排(rearranged during transfection,RET)基因融合发生率占1.4% ~ 2.5%,普拉替尼(Pralsetinib)是国内第一个获批上市的高选择性的RET抑制剂,疗效显著,但其应用仍缺乏真实世界的数据验证。
    目的 探讨特异性抑制剂普拉替尼治疗的伴有RET基因阳性(RET + ) NSCLC的真实世界疗效及安全性。
    方法  本研究回顾性分析了39例2017年3月— 2022年10月在解放军总医院接受普拉替尼治疗的RET + NSCLC的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的临床资料。分析了普拉替尼应用在一线、二线及以后治疗的客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)、疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)、无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)、至治疗失败时间(time to treatment failure,TTF)及药物安全性。
    结果  在39例纳入的研究对象中,女性24例(61.5%),中位年龄59(34 ~ 81)岁,26例(66.7%)为一线治疗,13例(33.3%)为二线及以后治疗。13例(33.3%)患者在用药时已有颅内转移瘤。在普拉替尼一线治疗的患者中,DCR为88.5%,ORR为50.0%,中位TTF 11.7月,中位PFS 11.7月。在二线及以后的患者中,DCR为76.9%,ORR为23.1%,中位TTF 8.2月,中位PFS 9.0月。13例伴有颅脑转移的患者颅内DCR为84.6%,ORR为46.2%。28例(71.8%)出现治疗相关不良反应,主要是血红蛋白减少13例(33.3%),中性粒细胞计数减少12例(30.8%)。5例发生3 ~ 4级的感染性肺炎的不良反应。无治疗相关不良反应而引起的死亡。
    结论  特异性抑制剂普拉替尼在局部晚期或转移性RET + NSCLC的应用中表现出了良好的临床疗效和持久反应,特别是对颅内病变的有一定的控制作用,并且安全性良好,但需要重视和识别与普拉替尼相关的肺炎。

     

    Abstract:
    Background The incidence of RET gene fusion translocation in Non-small cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients in China ranges from 1.4% to 2.5%, and Pralsetinib is the first high-selective RET inhibitor approved for marketing in China, with significant efficacy. However, its application still lacks real-world data validation.
    Objective To investigate the real-world effectiveness and safety profile of pralsetinib, a specific inhibitor, in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with RET gene alterations.
    Methods This retrospective study examined clinical data from 39 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who tested positive for RET fusion and received pralsetinib treatment at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between March 2017 and October 2022. The analysis encompassed objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and drug safety evaluations for first-line, second-line, and subsequent pralsetinib treatments.
    Results Among the 39 enrolled patients, there were 24 female patients (61.5%) with a median age of 59 (range: 34-81). First-line treatment was administered to 26 cases (66.7%), while second-line or subsequent treatments were given to 13 cases (33.3%). At treatment initiation, intracranial metastases were present in thirteen patients (33.3%). In patients receiving pralsetinib as first-line therapy, the DCR was 88.5%, the ORR was 50.0%, and both median TTF and PFS were recorded as 11.7 months. For those undergoing second-line or later treatments, DCR stood at 76.9%, ORR at 23.1%, with median TTF of 8.2 months and median PFS of 9.0 months. Among the thirteen patients with intracranial metastases, the DCR was determined to be 84.6%, while the ORR reached 46.2%. Treatment-related adverse reactions were observed in 28 cases (71.8%), with decreased hemoglobin levels being the most prevalent side effect (13 cases; 33.3%). Other adverse reactions included reduced neutrophil count in 12 cases (30.8%), elevated AST levels in 11 cases (28.2%), increased blood pressure in 10 cases (25.6%), raised ALT levels in 10 cases (25%), and diminished lymphocyte count in nine cases (23%). Notably, five individuals experienced grade 3/4 infectious pneumonia as an adverse reaction, but no treatment-related deaths occurred.
    Conclusion Pralsetinib, a specific inhibitor, has demonstrated robust clinical efficacy and sustained response in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Notably, it exhibits notable control over intracranial lesions and maintains excellent safety profile. However, vigilance is required for the identification of pralsetinib-associated pneumonia.

     

/

返回文章
返回