高原习服青年体能刻画分型及血常规与血液生化指标的差异分析

Characterization and classification of physical fitness and differential analysis of blood routine and biochemical indicators among plateau-acclimatized youth

  • 摘要: 背景 高原低压、缺氧环境是天然的体能训练场,习服训练前后体能发生显著变化。目前尚无针对高原习服的个 体体能量化标准,针对性指导开展科学训练存在较大局限性。目的 基于测试数据对高原习服青年个体体能进行精准分型, 探究不同体能维度与血常规、生化指标的关联,为优化高原体能训练指导策略提供科学参考。方法 选取世居平原的健康 男性青年,从低海拔(1 300 m)进驻高原(3 000 ~ 3 500 m)训练。在低海拔及高原习服6个月后,检测10项体能指标(握力、3 000 m跑、立定跳远等)及23项血液指标。通过相关性分析(|r|>0.45,P<0.001)聚类,将高原体能划分为7个维度:上肢力 量、下肢爆发力、心肺耐力、力量耐力、灵敏综合、柔韧性和协调性。基于百分位数评分法(前5%为10分,后5%为0分) 对个体进行体能刻画分型,并比较各维度优秀组(前10%)与普通组(后10%)的血液指标差异。结果 共纳入198名健康男性 青年,平均年龄20.18 ± 1.53岁。高原习服后体能变化:下肢爆发力(立定跳远+5%)、上肢力量(握力+3%)及协调性(六边形 跳时间-7.5%)显著提升(P<0.001),而心肺耐力(3 000 m跑时间+5.4%)、力量耐力(俯卧撑-8.3%)和灵敏综合(T型跑时间 +16.4%)显著下降(P<0.001)。体能分型分布:上肢力量型23人(9%)、下肢爆发力型26人(10.2%)、心肺耐力型39人 (15.3%)、力量耐力型39人(15.3%)、灵敏型37人(14.5%)、柔韧型47人(18.4%)和协调综合型44人(17.3%)。血液指标差异: 上肢力量优秀组的肌酐(CRE)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、α-羟丁酸脱氢酶(α-HBDH)显著高于普通组;下肢爆发力优秀组中肌酸 激酶(CK)、α-HBDH、LDH和中性粒细胞数目显著增高显著高于普通组(q<0.05);心肺耐力优秀组平均红细胞血红蛋白浓 度(MCHC)显著高于普通组(q<0.05);灵敏综合优秀组α-HBDH显著升高(q<0.05);力量耐力优秀组CK、α-HBDH和LDH 显著升高(q<0.05),嗜酸性粒细胞百分比、嗜酸性粒细胞数目显著减少(q<0.05);协调综合型优秀组中肌酸激酶同工酶 (CK-MB)和CRE显著高于普通组(q<0.05)。柔韧性型血生化和血常规均无显著差异。结论 本研究提出了数据驱动的体能 刻画评估方法,将高原体能细化分解为7个维度,建立了包含血液指标差异的个体化分型模型,可为高原体能训练科学指 导和作业任务强度分配提供合理化建议,拓展了高原体能量化评估研究的新领域。

     

    Abstract: Background The low-pressure, hypoxic environment of high-altitude areas serves as a natural physical training ground, where significant changes in physical fitness occur before and after acclimatization training. Currently, there is no standardized quantitative criterion for individual physical fitness during high-altitude acclimatization, which presents considerable limitations in providing targeted guidance for scientific training.Objective To conduct precise classification of individual physical fitness in acclimatized youth at high altitudes based on test data, explore the correlations between different physical fitness dimensions and routine blood as well as biochemical indicators, and provide a scientific reference for optimizing guidance strategies for high - altitude physical training. Methods A cohort of healthy male youth residing in low-altitude areas (1 300 m) was recruited. Participants underwent training at high altitude (3 000 - 3 500 m). Ten physical fitness tests (e.g., grip strength, 3 000-m run, standing long jump) and 23 blood indicators (hematology and biochemistry) were assessed pre-departure and after 6 months of acclimatization. Seven dimensions were identified via correlation analysis (|r|>0.45, P<0.001) and physiological rationale: upper body strength, lower-body power, cardiorespiratory endurance, strength endurance, agility, flexibility, and coordination. Individual scores per dimension were calculated using percentile-based grading (top 5%=10 points; bottom 5%=0 points). Participants were classified into types based on their dominant dimension. Superior (top 10%) and inferior (bottom 10%) groups within each dimension were compared for blood indicators. Statistical significance was set at q<0.05 after Bonferroni correction.Results A total of 198 healthy young males were selected, with an average age of (20.18±1.53) years. Participants were classified into seven fitness types: upper-body strength (n=23), lower-body power (n=26), cardiorespiratory endurance (n=39), strength endurance (n=39), agility (n=37), flexibility (n=47), and coordination (n=44). Significant changes in physical fitness were observed after high-altitude acclimatization: improvements in lower-body power (+5% in standing long jump, P<0.001), upper-body strength (+3% in grip strength, P<0.001), and coordination (-7.5% in hexagon jump time, P<0.001) contrasted with declines in cardiorespiratory endurance (+5.4% in 3 000 m run time, P<0.001), strength endurance (-8.3% in push-up count, P<0.001), and agility (+16.4% in T test time, P<0.001). Comparative analysis of blood biomarkers between superior (>90%) and inferior (<10%) groups within each dimension revealed dimension-specific differences, upper-body strength showed significant elevations in creatinine (CRE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (α-HBDH) (q<0.05); lower-body power demonstrated increased creatine kinase (CK), α-HBDH, LDH, and neutrophil count (q<0.05); cardiorespiratory endurance exhibited higher mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (q<0.05); agility displayed elevated α-HBDH (q<0.05); strength endurance presented increased CK and α-HBDH with concurrent reductions in eosinophil percentage and count (q<0.05); coordination showed higher CK isoenzyme (CK-MB) and CRE (q<0.05); while flexibility exhibited no significant differences.Conclusion This study proposes a data-driven method for characterizing and evaluating physical fitness, which refines plateau physical fitness into 7 dimensions and establishes an individualized typing model incorporating differences in blood indicators. It can provide rational suggestions for scientific guidance of plateau physical fitness training and intensity allocation of operational tasks, and expand new fields in the research on quantitative evaluation of plateau physical fitness.

     

/

返回文章
返回