EGFR 20外显子插入突变非小细胞肺癌的分子亚型和预后比较研究

Clinical characteristics and treatment strategies in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations: A retrospective study

  • 摘要:
    背景 表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)基因第 20 号外显子插入(exon 20 insertion, ex20ins)突变非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)是最常见的非经典EGFR基因突变,长期以来缺乏有效的治疗方案。目的 探讨中国人群中EGFR ex20ins突变NSCLC患者的临床特征及不同治疗方案的疗效与生存影响,以优化临床治疗策略。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月1日至2024年11月1日解放军总医院第一医学中心及第五医学中心收治的晚期EGFR ex20ins突变NSCLC患者的临床数据。患者接受了一线及以上的化疗、靶向治疗或免疫治疗,疗效评估依据RECIST 1.1标准。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算中位无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)和总生存期(overall survival,OS),并通过Cox回归模型评估预后的HR和95% CI。结果 本研究共纳入62例晚期EGFR ex20ins突变NSCLC患者,患者中位年龄为60岁,61.7%的患者(38例)为女性,发现21种的不同分子亚型,其中以EGFR exon 20 p.A767-V769dup最为常见(12/39,30.8%)。患者接受一线治疗的PFS为9.4个月(95% CI:7.4 ~ 11.5个月),靶向治疗(中位PFS 10.5个月)疗效好于化疗(中位PFS 8.7个月)及免疫治疗(中位PFS 5.8个月),但差异无显著性(Plog-rank=0.792)。整体中位OS为28.7个月(95% CI:19.5 ~ 37.9个月),接受靶向治疗的患者OS更长(中位OS:31.7个月vs 19.3个月)(HR=0.79,95% CI:0.26 ~ 2.45,P=0.684),但无显著差异(Plog-rank=0.683),近环插入突变患者的预后优于远环插入突变患者(中位OS:45.7个月vs 24.9个月)(HR=0.19,95% CI:0.06 ~ 0.59,P=0.004)(Plog-rank=0.001),其中接受靶向治疗的近环突变患者与远环突变患者相比中位OS更长(51.3个月vs 6.4个月)(HR=0.10,95% CI:0.03 ~ 0.35,P=0.000)(Plog-rank=0.000)。结论 靶向治疗对EGFR ex20ins突变NSCLC患者的疗效优于化疗和免疫治疗,尤其对于近环插入突变患者能够获得OS的获益。插入位点是影响疗效和总生存的重要因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations represent the most common non-classical EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet effective treatment options have long been lacking.Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and evaluate the efficacy and survival outcomes of different therapies in Chinese patients with advanced EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC to optimize clinical strategies. Methods Clinical data about patients with advanced EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC treated at the First and the Fifth Medical Centers of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 1, 2015 to November 1, 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to identify insertion subtypes and confirm mutation status. Patients received first-line or subsequent chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy. Treatment response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. KaplanMeier analysis was employed to calculate median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and Cox regression models were used to evaluate prognostic factors.Results Totally 62 patients with advanced EGFR ex20ins mutant NSCLC were included. The median age of the patients was 60 years, with 61.7% (38 cases) being female. Twenty-one distinct molecular subtypes were identified, among which EGFR exon 20 p.A767-V769dup was the most prevalent (12/39, 30.8%). Patients receiving first-line treatment achieved a median PFS of 9.4 months (95% CI: 7.4 - 11.5 months). Targeted therapy demonstrated superior efficacy (median PFS: 10.5 months) compared to chemotherapy (median PFS: 8.7 months) and immunotherapy (median PFS: 5.8 months), though the differences were not statistically significant (Plog-rank = 0.792). The OS was 28.7 months (95% CI: 19.5 - 37.9 months). Patients receiving targeted therapy exhibited longer OS (median OS: 31.7 months vs 19.3 months) (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.26 - 2.45, P = 0.684), but the difference was not statistically significant (Plog-rank = 0.683). Notably, patients with near-loop insertion mutations had significantly better prognosis than those with far-loop insertion mutations (median OS: 45.7 months vs 24.9 months)(HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06 - 0.59, P= 0.004) (Plog-rank = 0.001). Among patients receiving targeted therapy, those with near-loop insertion mutations exhibited significantly longer OS compared to those with far-loop insertion mutations (51.3 months vs 6.4 months; HR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.03 - 0.35, P = 0.000) (Plog-rank = 0.000). Conclusion Targeted therapy demonstrates superior efficacy over chemotherapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations, particularly benefiting those with near-loop insertions by improving OS. Insertion sites serve as a critical determinant of treatment response and OS, and should be a key consideration in clinical decision-making.

     

/

返回文章
返回