醛固酮水平与原发性高血压患者肾损害的关联研究

Association between aldosterone levels and renal injury in patients with essential hypertension

  • 摘要:
    背景 肾损害是原发性高血压常见的靶器官损害,早期识别及干预有助于延缓及预防终末期肾病的发生。既往研究显示,醛固酮水平与完全药物洗脱状态下原发性高血压患者尿微量白蛋白水平独立相关。但醛固酮对接受治疗的原发性高血压患者包含正在服用血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂(angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,ACEI)或血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonists,ARB)的肾损害影响尚不明确。
    目的 探讨醛固酮对接受治疗的原发性高血压(包含正在服用ACEI或ARB)患者肾损害的影响。
    方法 本文为横断面研究,选取2021年1月—2024年10月在解放军总医院第六医学中心心血管内四科住院的接受药物治疗的原发性高血压患者。根据患者卧位醛固酮水平,按照五分位法将其分为Q1组<4.8 ng/dL,Q2组(4.8 ~ 6.39) ng/dL,Q3组(6.4 ~ 8.49) ng/dL,Q4组(8.5 ~ 11.24) ng/dL,Q5组≥11.25 ng/dL。收集患者性别、年龄、体重指数、原发性高血压病程、血压、心率、空腹血糖、肾功能、血脂、肾素、醛固酮、24 h尿蛋白、24 h尿微量白蛋白等资料。采用多因素logistic回归分析探讨醛固酮与原发性高血压肾损害的关联。
    结果 共纳入原发性高血压患者895例,男性501例(55.98%),平均年龄(54.46±14.51)岁。患者中位醛固酮水平为7.4(IQR:5.30~10.30) ng/dL,Q1、Q2、Q3、Q4和Q5组肾损害比例分别为31/177、35/184、29/173、40/182和65/179(P<0.05),显示出随醛固酮水平同向升高的趋势。与Q1、Q2、Q3和Q4组比较,Q5组患者更年轻,收缩压和舒张压更高,心率更快,血钾和血氯水平更低,冠心病的比例更低,慢性肾功能不全比例更高,24 h尿蛋白、24 h尿微量白蛋白更高(P<0.05)。在校正了其他混杂因素(年龄、性别、体重指数、收缩压、舒张压、饮酒史、血钾、血尿酸、总胆固醇、三酰甘油、ACEI、ARB、糖尿病)后,Q5组的肾损害风险显著高于Q1组(OR=2.571,95% CI:1.456 ~ 4.538,P=0.001)。在去除服用ACEI或ARB的原发性高血压患者的敏感性分析也发现Q5组的肾损害风险显著高于Q1组(OR=2.387,95% CI:1.139 ~ 5.004,P=0.021)。
    结论 血浆醛固酮水平升高与原发性高血压患者肾损害独立关联,且随血浆醛固酮水平升高肾损害风险增加,提示醛固酮可能参与原发性高血压相关肾脏损伤的发生和发展过程。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Renal injury is a common target organ damage associated with hypertension. Early identification and intervention can help delay or prevent the occurrence of end-stage renal disease. Previous studies have shown that aldosterone levels are independently associated with urinary microalbuminuria in patients with essential hypertension under complete drug washout conditions. However, the impact of aldosterone on renal injury in patients with essential hypertension—including those receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonists (ARBs)—remains unclear.
    Objective To explore the effect of aldosterone on renal injury in treated primary hypertension patients (including those taking ACEI or ARB).
    Methods Patients with treated essential hypertension who were hospitalized in the Department of Hypertension, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2021 to October 2024 were enrolled. According to their supine aldosterone levels, participants were stratified into quintiles using the following cutoffs, Q1 group (< 4.8 ng/dL), Q2 group (4.8 - 6.39 ng/dL), Q3 group (6.4 - 8.49 ng/dL), Q4 group (8.5 - 11.24 ng/dL), and Q5 group (≥11.25 ng/dL). Data including sex, age, body mass index, duration of hypertension, blood pressure, heart rate, fasting blood glucose, renal function, lipid profile, renin, aldosterone, 24 h urine protein, and 24 h urinary microalbumin were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of aldosterone on renal injury in patients with essential hypertension.
    Results A total of 895 patients with essential hypertension were enrolled, including 501 males (55.98%), with a mean age of (54.46 ± 14.51) years. The median plasma aldosterone level was 7.40 (IQR: 5.30 - 10.30) ng/dL. The renal injury rates progressively increased across aldosterone quartiles (Q1 - Q5: 31/177, 35/184, 29/173, 40/182, and 65/179, respectively; P < 0.05), exhibiting a positive correlation with aldosterone levels. Compared with patients in the Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 groups, patients in the Q5 group were younger, with higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures, faster heart rates, lower levels of blood potassium and chloride, lower proportion of coronary heart disease, and higher proportion of chronic renal insufficiency. Additionally, 24 h urine protein and 24 h urinary microalbumin levels were higher in the Q5 group. After adjusting for other confounding factors (age, gender, body mass index, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, smoking history, drinking history, blood potassium, blood uric acid, total cholesterol, triglycerides, ACEI, ARB, calcium channel blockers, diabetes, and coronary heart disease), the risk of renal injury in the Q5 group was significantly higher than that in the Q1 groups (OR=2.571, 95% CI: 1.456 - 4.538, P=0.001). In the sensitivity analysis excluding patients receiving ACEI or ARB, the risk of renal injury in the Q5 group remained significantly higher than that Q1 group (OR=2.387, 95% CI: 1.139 - 5.004, P=0.021).
    Conclusion Elevated plasma aldosterone levels are independently associated with renal injury in patients with essential hypertension. Higher aldosterone levels may contribute to hypertension-mediated renal injury, suggesting the potential value of aldosterone assessment for risk stratification.

     

/

返回文章
返回