正念疗法对精神障碍患者抑郁与焦虑症状的疗效:基于随机对照试验的Meta分析

Efficacy of mindfulness-based therapy on depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with mental disorders: A Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • 摘要: 背景 正念疗法(mindfulness-based therapy,MBT)作为一种整合认知行为技术的心理干预手段应用广泛,但其对 精神障碍患者焦虑及抑郁症状的疗效存在异质性,其来源值得系统解析。目的 系统评价MBT对精神障碍患者焦虑、抑郁 症状的干预效果,解析异质性来源,探讨文化适应性对疗效的影响,为临床实践提供循证依据。方法 检索PubMed、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library、中国知网等中英文数据库(2015年1月至2025年1月),纳入了评估正念疗法(MBT)改善精 神障碍患者抑郁焦虑症状疗效的22项RCT(n=1 723),采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析,异质性通过Q检验与I²统计量评 估。通过亚组分析探索异质性来源。主要结局为抑郁(BDI-Ⅱ、HAMD、PHQ-9)和焦虑(HAMA、BAI、GAD-7)量表评分变 化,以标准化均数差(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI)报告。结果 Meta分析显示,MBT可显著缓解精神障碍患者的抑郁症状 (SMD = -0.81,95% CI:-1.13 ~ -0.49)和焦虑症状(SMD = -1.21,95% CI:-1.74 ~ -0.67),效应量达中等至大。但异质性极高 (抑郁I²=89%,焦虑I²=93%),提示纳入研究间存在显著差异,结果解读需高度谨慎,且疗效存在较大变异。亚组分析显示, 抑郁测评工具中,BDI-Ⅱ与PHQ-9的敏感性高于HAMD(P<0.01);东方文化背景下抑郁症状缓解效果显著优于西方(SMD:-1.23 vs -0.42);短期干预(<8周)效果优于长期方案(SMD:-1.63 vs -0.22)。焦虑症状缓解亦呈现量表依赖性(GAD-7效应量 最大)及文化差异。结论 MBT对精神障碍患者的焦虑、抑郁症状显示出改善潜力。鉴于疗效存在高度异质性,临床实践 需强调个性化干预,并关注文化适配性设计及长期疗效维持策略。

     

    Abstract: Background Mindfulness-based therapy (MBT), a psychological intervention integrating cognitive-behavioral technique, is widely applied in clinical settings. However, systematic validation of its heterogeneous efficacy in alleviating anxiety and depressive symptoms among patients with diagnosed mental disorders remains insufficient. Objective To systematically evaluate the intervention effects of MBT on anxiety and depressive symptoms in clinically diagnosed mental disorder patients, identify sources of heterogeneity, explore the impact of cultural adaptability on efficacy, and provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of mindfulness-based therapy (MBT) in improving depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with mental disorders were included. Twenty-two RCTs (n = 1 723) published from January 2015 to January 2025 were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, and other English/Chinese databases. A random-effects model was employed for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I² statistics. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate heterogeneity sources. Primary outcomes included changes in depressive symptoms (assessed via BDI-Ⅱ, HAMD, or PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms (assessed via HAMA, BAI, or GAD-7), reported as standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results Meta-analysis demonstrated that MBT significantly improved depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.49) and anxiety symptoms (SMD = -1.21, 95% CI: -1.74 to -0.67), with moderate-to-large effect sizes. However, high heterogeneity was observed (depression: I² = 89%; anxiety: I² = 93%). Subgroup analyses revealed greater sensitivity of BDI- Ⅱ and PHQ-9 compared to HAMD for depressive symptom assessment (P < 0.01), superior depressive symptom improvement in Eastern cultural contexts versus Western settings (SMD: -1.23 vs -0.42), and enhanced efficacy of short-term interventions (<8 weeks) over long-term protocols (SMD: -1.63 vs -0.22). Anxiety symptom improvement exhibited scale dependency (highest effect size for GAD-7) and cultural variations. Conclusion MBT demonstrates robust efficacy in alleviating anxiety and depressive symptoms in mental disorder patients. However, culturally adaptive intervention designs and strategies for sustaining long-term therapeutic benefits require prioritized attention, which provides evidence-based support for personalized clinical interventions.

     

/

返回文章
返回