JAK1 抑制剂单药及联合PDE4 抑制剂治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效及安全性研究

Effectiveness and safety of JAK1 inhibitors combined with PDE4 inhibitors in treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

  • 摘要: 背景 阿布昔替尼是首个获批的高选择性JAK1 抑制剂,通过抑制JAK1 减少炎症细胞因子产生,可有效缓解特应性皮炎(Atopic Dermatitis,AD)症状。现有研究表明,其联合其他外用药物疗效优于单药治疗。目的 评估JAK1 抑制剂单药与联合PDE4 抑制剂治疗中重度AD患者的疗效和安全性。方法 采用前瞻性、随机对照临床试验设计。选取2023 年11月至2024 年3 月中日友好医院皮肤科门诊接诊的中重度AD患者。随机分配至联合用药组和单药组,其中联合用药组口服阿布昔替尼片(JAK1 抑制剂)100 mg 每日1 次,并外用克立硼罗软膏(PDE4 抑制剂)每日2 次,单药组仅口服阿布昔替尼片100 mg每日1 次。主要终点为在第12 周时湿疹面积和严重程度指数至少改善75% (EASI-75)和/或研究者总体评分(IGA)为0分(完全清除)或1 分(几乎清除)的患者比例。次要终点包括第2、4、8 和12 周时湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)至少改善50%/90%的患者比例,以及峰值瘙痒数值评分(PP-NRS)超过或达到4 分的患者比例。结果 本研究入组患者50 例,失访10例,40 例纳入分析,其中联合用药组19 例,单药组21 例,两组的性别、年龄、病程均无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组在第2、4、8 和12 周的随访中,EASI 及IGA评分均较基线有显著改善(P<0.05);在第12 周时,联合用药组的EASI-75 应答率高于单药组(84.21% vs 52.38%,P=0.039);联合用药组的IGA0/1 应答率高于单药组(68.42% vs 33.33%,P=0.030);联合用药组的PP-NRS-4 应答率高于单药组(73.68% vs 33.33%,P=0.014)。未观察到严重不良事件。结论 阿布昔替尼片联合克立硼罗软膏在改善AD症状方面有显著疗效,该联合治疗方案有望成为中重度AD患者的更优治疗选择。

     

    Abstract: Background Abrocitinib is the first approved, highly selective JAK1 inhibitor. By inhibiting JAK1 and reducing the production of inflammatory cytokines, it can effectively alleviate the symptoms of atopic dermatitis (AD). Existing studies have shown that its effectiveness in combination with other topical medications is superior to monotherapy.Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of JAK1 inhibitors alone and in combination with PDE4 inhibitors in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe AD. Methods A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial design was adopted. Patients with moderate to severe AD who were seen at the Dermatology Outpatient Clinic of the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from November 2023 to March 2024 were selected. Patients were randomly assigned to either the combination therapy group or the monotherapy group. The combination therapy group received oral abrocitinib tablets (a JAK1 inhibitor) at a dose of 100 mg once daily, along with topical crisaborole ointment (a PDE4 inhibitor) applied twice daily. The monotherapy group received only oral abrocitinib tablets at 100 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved at least a 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) and/or an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) at week 12. Secondary endpoints included the proportions of patients achieving at least a 50% or 90% improvement in EASI (EASI-50/EASI-90) at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12, as well as the proportion of patients with a Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score of 4 or higher. Results A total of 50 patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 10 were lost to follow-up; therefore, 40 patients were included in the analysis, with 19 in the combination therapy group and 21 in the monotherapy group. There were no significant differences in gender, age, or disease duration between the combination group and monotherapy group (P>0.05). EASI and IGA scores significantly improved compared to baseline in both groups at the 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 12th week follow-up (P<0.05). At week 12, the EASI-75 response rate was higher in the combination group than that in the monotherapy group (84.21% vs 52.38%, P=0.039). The IGA0/1 response rate was higher in the combination group than that in the monotherapy group (68.42% vs 33.33%, P=0.014). The PP-NRS-4 response rate was higher in the combination group than that in the monotherapy group (73.68% vs 33.33%, P<0.05). No unexpected serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion Abrocitinib tablets combined with crisaborole ointment show significant effectiveness in improving the symptoms of AD, and this combined treatment regimen is expected to become a better treatment option for patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

     

/

返回文章
返回