常见无创评分指标对代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者肝硬化的诊断效能分析

Diagnostic value of common non-invasive scoring indices for cirrhosis in patients with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease

  • 摘要:
    背景 代谢相关脂肪性肝病(metabolic-associated fatty liver disease,MAFLD)是全球范围内高发的慢性肝脏疾病,肝硬化作为其严重进展结局,严重威胁患者健康。无创评分指标因其便捷性被临床广泛应用,但其对MAFLD患者肝硬化风险的评估价值以及对慢性乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus, HBV)感染的评估效能,目前均无明确证据。
    目的 探讨天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数(AST-to-platelet ratio index,APRI)、肝纤维化-4指数(fibrosis-4 index,FIB-4)等无创指标对MAFLD患者肝硬化诊断效能,明确关联因素及慢性HBV感染的修饰作用。
    方法 收集2023年1月— 2024年7月解放军总医院第五医学中心收治诊断为代谢相关脂肪性肝病的患者。收集患者一般资料、实验室指标、影像学参数以及无创评分结果,采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析筛选肝硬化的独立相关因素,通过分层分析探讨慢性HBV感染的效应修饰作用,并利用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线比较APRI、FIB-4、肝脏弹性硬度值(liver stiffness measurement,LSM)、超声衰减参数(ultrasound attenuation parameter,UAP)的诊断效能。
    结果 435例患者纳入分析,其中男261例(60%),女174例(40%),平均年龄49.5岁。有肝硬化者166例,无肝硬化者269例,两组在性别、年龄、慢性HBV感染、血小板水平以及肝纤维化相关指标FIB-4、APRI、LSM上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归显示:在包含APRI的模型中,年龄≥60岁(OR=3.216)、男性(OR=2.397)、慢性HBV感染(OR=2.450)及LSM≥12.0 kPa(OR=9.183)与肝硬化现患均独立关联(P<0.01),而APRI与肝硬化无显著关联(P>0.05);在包含FIB-4的模型中,FIB-4≥2.67与肝硬化现患强关联(OR=32.005,P<0.001),且慢性HBV感染与FIB-4存在显著的交互效应(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,总体人群中FIB-4诊断肝硬化的ROC曲线下面积AUC显著高于APRI(0.735 vs 0.658,P<0.001);在无HBV感染亚组中,FIB-4的AUC优势更为显著(0.855 vs 0.740,P<0.001),而在合并HBV感染亚组中,两者的诊断效能均下降且差异无统计学意义(P=0.061)。
    结论 FIB-4对MAFLD患者肝硬化的诊断效能优于APRI,且慢性HBV感染状态通过交互效应显著影响其诊断价值,在无HBV感染时FIB-4的识别效能更优,可作为临床无创评估MAFLD患者肝硬化风险的优选指标。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), a highly prevalent chronic liver disease globally, has cirrhosis as its severe progressive outcome, which seriously threatens patient health. Non-invasive scoring indices are widely used in clinical practice due to their convenience; however, there is currently no clear evidence for their value in assessing cirrhosis risk in MAFLD patients or their efficacy in evaluating hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
    Objective To investigate the associations between non-invasive indices such as the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), etal. and the prevalence status of cirrhosis in patients with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), and identify related factors and the modifying effect of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
    Methods Patients diagnosed with MAFLD who were admitted to the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2023 to July 2024 were enrolled. General clinical data, laboratory indicators, imaging parameters, and non-invasive scoring results of the patients were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with liver cirrhosis. Stratified analysis was conducted to explore the effect modification of chronic HBV infection. The diagnostic efficacy of APRI, FIB-4, liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and ultrasound attenuation parameter (UAP) was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
    Results Totally 435 patients were included in the analysis, comprising 261 males (60%) and 174 females (40%), with a mean age of 49.5 years. There were 166 cases with cirrhosis and 269 cases without cirrhosis. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in gender, age, chronic HBV infection, platelet levels, and liver fibrosis-related indicators (FIB-4, APRI, and LSM) (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that in the model incorporating APRI, age ≥60 years (OR=3.216), male gender (OR=2.397), chronic HBV infection (OR=2.450), and LSM ≥12.0 kPa (OR=9.183) were independently associated with prevalent cirrhosis (all P < 0.01), while APRI showed no significant association with cirrhosis (P > 0.05). In the model incorporating FIB-4, FIB-4 ≥2.67 was strongly associated with prevalent cirrhosis (OR=32.005, P < 0.001), and a significant interaction effect was observed between chronic HBV infection and FIB-4 (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) of FIB-4 for diagnosing cirrhosis was significantly higher than that of APRI in the overall population (0.735 vs 0.658, P < 0.001). In the subgroup without HBV infection, the superiority of FIB-4's AUC was more pronounced (0.855 vs 0.740, P < 0.001). However, in the subgroup with HBV co-infection, the diagnostic efficacy of both indicators decreased, and no significant difference was found between them (P=0.061).
    Conclusion The diagnostic efficacy of FIB-4 for cirrhosis in MAFLD patients is superior to that of APRI. The status of chronic HBV infection significantly affects the diagnostic value of FIB-4 through an interaction effect. In the absence of HBV infection, FIB-4 demonstrates better risk identification performance and can serve as a preferred indicator for the non-invasive clinical assessment of cirrhosis risk in MAFLD patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回