涎腺腺泡细胞癌与分泌性癌的临床病理特点及预后对比:单中心19 年队列研究

Clinical pathological features and prognostic comparison of acinic cell carcinoma and secretory carcinoma of salivary glands: A 19-year single-center cohort study

  • 摘要: 背景 涎腺分泌性癌(secretary carcinoma,SC)及腺泡细胞癌(acinic cell carcinoma,AciCC)均属于涎腺低度恶性上皮来源的肿瘤,由于两者组织学形态及细胞类型均具有多样性,极其相似,所以对此两种类型肿瘤的鉴别诊断及预后的判断存在一定困难。目的 对涎腺腺泡细胞癌及分泌性癌临床病理特点进行对比研究,为涎腺AciCC及SC的临床诊治提供准确的病理诊断依据。方法 回顾分析2005 年9 月— 2024 年9 月期间解放军总医院第一医学中心病理科诊断为涎腺AciCC及SC的病例,收集常规病理、免疫组化和分子检测资料,并对预后情况进行随访。结果 本研究共纳入109 例病例,其中涎腺AciCC90 例,SC19 例。两组患者的平均年龄分别为(44.0±17.7)岁和(40.0±15.7)岁,中位年龄均为46 岁。性别分布上,AciCC 组男性占38.9%(35/90),SC组男性占73.7%(14/19),组间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.006)。在发病部位方面,两者均好发于腮腺,AciCC 组中腮腺肿瘤占85.6%(77/90),SC组中占89.5%(17/19)。常规病理学观察显示,两种肿瘤在细胞学和组织学上存在重叠,均可表现为管状、实性、微囊或乳头状结构。免疫组化检测结果具有鉴别意义,SC组均显示S-100、SOX10 及Mammaglobin 的弥漫强阳性表达,而AciCC 组均不表达上述标志物。分子病理检测显示SC 组多数病例(68.4%,13/19)检出ETV6-NTRK3 融合基因,而AciCC 组均未检出该融合。生存分析显示,AciCC 组的中位生存时间为72.5 个月(95% CI:78.7 ~ 107.8),SC组的中位生存时间为48.0 个月(95% CI:32.7 ~ 79.2)。Log-rank 检验表明,两组患者的生存差异具有统计学意义(P=0.008)。结论 涎腺AciCC与SC患者在性别分布、免疫表型、分子遗传特征及长期生存模式上存在区别。尤其是SC普遍存在的ETV6-NTRK3 融合基因,不仅可作为鉴别诊断的关键依据,也为靶向治疗提供了潜在切入点。

     

    Abstract: Background Both secretary carcinoma (SC) and acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) of the salivary glands are lowgrade malignant tumors of epithelial origin. Due to the diversity of their histological morphology and cell types, which are extremely similar, there are certain difficulties and insufficient understanding in the differential diagnosis and prognosis judgment of these two types of tumors. Objective To conduct a comparative study on the clinical and pathological features of AciCC and SC of salivary glands, aiming to provide accurate pathological diagnostic evidence for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of salivary gland AciCC and SC. Methods Cases of salivary gland AciCC and SC diagnosed at the Department of Pathology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from September 2005 to September 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The study encompassed clinicopathological and molecular data, including routine histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular testing, along with prognostic follow-up to compare outcomes. Results A total of 109 cases were included in this study, comprising 90 cases of salivary gland AciCC and 19 cases of SC. The mean age of the two groups was (44.0±17.7) years and (40.0±15.7) years, respectively, with a median age of 46 years in both groups. Regarding gender distribution, males accounted for 38.9% (35/90) in the AciCC group and 73.7% (14/19) in the SC group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.006). In terms of tumor location, both types showed a predilection for the parotid gland, with parotid involvement observed in 85.6% (77/ 90) of AciCC cases and 89.5% (17/19) of SC cases. Conventional pathological examination revealed overlapping cytological and histological features between the two tumor types, both of which may present with tubular, solid, microcystic, or papillary structures. Immunohistochemical findings provided discriminative value, all SC cases exhibited diffuse and strong positivity for S-100, SOX10, and Mammaglobin, whereas none of the AciCC cases expressed these markers. Molecular pathology further supported the distinction, as the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene was detected in most of SC cases (68.4%, 13/19) but was absent in all AciCC cases. Survival analysis indicated that the median survival time was 72.5 months (95% CI: 78.7 - 107.8) in the AciCC group and 48.0 months (95% CI: 32.7 - 79.2) in the SC group. Log-rank test demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups (P=0.008). Conclusion Salivary gland AciCC and SC exhibit distinct differences in gender distribution, immunophenotypes, molecular genetic profiles, and long-term survival patterns. Notably, the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene, which is consistently present in SC, serves not only as a key diagnostic marker but also represents a promising avenue for targeted therapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回