METS-IR指数与非心脏手术后心肌损伤的关系:基于CKM综合征分期的队列研究

Association between METS-IR index and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: A cohort study based on CKM syndrome staging

  • 摘要: 背景 非心脏手术后心肌损伤(MINS)是非心脏手术后常见的心血管并发症。代谢评分-胰岛素抵抗指数(METS-IR)作为新型胰岛素抵抗替代指标,其与非心脏手术后心肌损伤的关系及在心血管-肾脏-代谢(CKM)综合征分期中的预测价值尚不明确。目的 探讨METS-IR指数与非心脏手术患者非心脏手术后心肌损伤的关系,并分析其与CKM综合征分期的关联。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年12月在中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心接受非心脏手术的12, 086例患者。根据METS-IR指数三分位数将患者分为T1至T3组。采用多因素Logistic回归分析METS-IR与MINS的关系,并按年龄、性别、糖尿病、高血压、BMI及CKM综合征分期进行亚组分析,通过交互作用检验评估各亚组间关联的一致性。结果 MINS发生率为7.1%(853/12, 086)。完全调整模型显示,与T1组相比,T3组MINS风险显著升高(OR=1.45,95%CI 1.14-1.85,P=0.002),T2组差异无统计学意义(OR=1.09,95%CI 0.86-1.39,P=0.463)。METS-IR与MINS呈正相关剂量反应关系(趋势P<0.001)。亚组分析显示,METS-IR与MINS的关联在不同年龄(<65岁 vs ≥65岁)、性别、糖尿病、高血压、BMI及CKM分期亚组中保持一致(所有交互作用P>0.05)。次要结局方面,T3组急性肾损伤风险同样升高(OR=1.28,95%CI 1.00-1.63,P=0.048)。结论 METS-IR指数与非心脏手术患者MINS风险呈正相关。高METS-IR(T3组)患者MINS风险增加45%。METS-IR可作为预测围术期心血管风险的参考指标。

     

    Abstract: Background Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) is a common cardiovascular complication following noncardiac surgery. The metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR), as a novel surrogate marker of insulin resistance, its association with perioperative myocardial injury and the relationship with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome staging remain unclear. Objective To investigate the association between METS-IR index and MINS in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, and to analyze its relationship with CKM syndrome staging. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 12, 086 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. Patients were categorized into tertiles (T1-T3) based on METS-IR index. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between METS-IR and MINS. Subgroup analyses were performed by age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, BMI, and CKM syndrome stage, with interaction tests to evaluate consistency of associations across subgroups.Results The incidence of MINS was 7.1% (853/12, 086). In the fully adjusted model, compared with T1, T3 showed significantly elevated MINS risk (OR=1.45, 95%CI 1.14-1.85, P=0.002), while T2 showed no significant difference (OR=1.09, 95%CI 0.86-1.39, P=0.463). A positive dose-response relationship was observed between METS-IR and MINS (P for trend <0.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the association between METS-IR and MINS remained consistent across different age groups (<65 vs ≥65 years), sex, diabetes, hypertension, BMI, and CKM stages (all P for interaction >0.05). For secondary outcomes, T3 group also showed increased acute kidney injury risk (OR=1.28, 95%CI 1.00-1.63, P=0.048). Conclusion METS-IR index demonstrates a positive association with MINS risk in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Patients with high METS-IR (T3 group) had 45% increased MINS risk. METS-IR may serve as a convenient tool for perioperative cardiovascular risk assessment.

     

/

返回文章
返回