晚期胃癌应用多西他赛联合顺铂、5-FU一线方案化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少与疗效和生存的相关性

Correlation between degree of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) caused by the first line DCF scheme and curative effect and survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨晚期胃癌一线应用多西他赛联合顺铂、5-FU方案(DCF方案)化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少(chemotherapyinduced neutropenia,CIN)程度与疗效和生存的相关性。 方法 回顾性分析2007 - 2012年在我院病理科诊断为胃癌的无法手术、有可评估病灶且接受一线DCF方案化疗至少2周期,但不超过6周期的患者临床资料。根据美国癌症研究所常见毒性判定标准4.0(Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events,CTCAE 4.0)将CIN分为G0、G1/2、G3、G4组。G0为无中性粒细胞抑制组,G1/2为轻度中性粒细胞抑制组,G3为中度中性粒细胞抑制组,G4为重度中性粒细胞抑制组。了解化疗期间CIN程度与化疗疗效及预后的关系。 结果 与G0组相比,G1/2组可降低48%疾病进展风险(HR=0.52,95% CI:0.44 ~0.69),G3组可降低31%(HR=0.69,95% CI:0.37~0.89),G4组可降低25%(HR=0.75,95% CI:0.46~0.98);与G0组相比,G1/2组可降低41%死亡风险(HR=0.59,95% CI:0.49~0.72),G3组可降低29%(HR=0.71,95% CI:0.52~0.90),G4组可降低26%(HR=0.74,95% CI:0.46~0.93)。CIN G0组客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)为13.3%,疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)为33.3%;G1/2组ORR为53.7%,DCR为75.9%;G3组ORR为45.5%,DCR为68.2%;G4组ORR为10.5%,DCR为57.9%。4组DCR和ORR的差异有统计学意义,其中G1/2组疗效最佳。 结论 晚期胃癌患者化疗中出现G1/2级CIN预示着更好的疗效和预后,而G0级疗效及预后最差,提示此组患者化疗药物或许未达到最佳有效剂量,另外G4级疗效和预后并未优于G3级。监测中性粒细胞水平有利于早期疗效评估及预后判断,并有助于调整化疗药物剂量。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the correlation between the degree of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) caused by the first line DCF scheme and the curative effect and survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Clinical data about 110 patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer from 2007 to 2012 in our hospital who underwent first-line chemotherapy of DCF regimen at least 2 cycles were retrospectively analyzed. According to the CTCAE 4, CIN was divided into: G0, G1/2, G3, G4 group. The association between CIN and chemotherapy curative effect and prognosis was assessed. Results The multivariate analysis showed that compared with G0 group, the hazard ratio of disease-progression was decreased by 48% (HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.44 - 0.69, P=0.005) in G1/2 group, 31% (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.37 - 0.89, P=0.001) in G3 group and 25% (HR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.98, P=0.023) in G4 group. Similarly, the hazard ratio of death was decreased by 41% (HR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.49 - 0.72, P=0.001) in G1/2 group in comparison with G0 group, 29% (HR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.52 - 0.90, P=0.000) in G3 group, and 26% (HR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.93, P=0.009) in G4 group. The ORR value of G0, G1/2, G3, G4 group were 13.3%, 53.7%, 45.5%, 10.5%, respectively; The DCR value of G0, G1/2, G3, G4 group were 33.3%, 75.9%, 68.2%, 57.9%, respectively. Both ORR and DCR value of the four groups showed significantly statistical differences with the best efficacy showed in G1/2 group. Conclusion Patients who experience G1/2 CIN have a more favorable treatment response and prognosis, however, absence of CIN represents poor efficacy and survival, which suggests that patients in G0 group may not achieve the best effective dose. In addition, G4 CIN does not show better efficacy and prognosis. Therefore, monitoring of CIN is conducive to the early evaluation of curative effect and prognosis, and it is helpful in adjusting the dosage of chemotherapy drugs.

     

/

返回文章
返回