微创与开放经椎间孔椎间融合术治疗肥胖患者腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较

The rapeutic effect comparison of minimally invasive surgery and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of obese patients with lumbar intervertebral disc

  • 摘要: 目的 研究腰椎微创(minimally invasive,MIS)经椎间孔椎体间融合术(transforaminal lumber interbody fusion,TLIF)与开放经椎间孔椎体间融合术(Open-TILF)治疗肥胖(体质量指数> 30 kg/m2)腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2011年1月- 2013年12月我院收治的肥胖腰椎间盘突出症患者79例,体质量指数均> 30 kg/m2,分别行MISTLIF与Open-TILF治疗,其中MIS-TLIF组46例,Open-TILF组33例,应用日本矫形协会评分标准、视觉模拟评分,腰椎功能障碍指数法评分比较两组术后临床疗效及平均手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、下地活动时间、平均住院时间、并发症等。 结果 两组患者术前一般资料无统计学差异(P> 0.05),术后即刻X线片示内固定位置良好。Open组术中出血量(420±86) ml,切口长度(80±40) mm,术后下地活动时间(4.2±2.21) d;平均住院时间(9.3±3.40) d,并发症发生率平均9.09%。MIS-TLIF组手术中出血量(110.83±50.51) ml,切口长度(2.5±0.18) cm,术后下床时间(24.37±8.50) h,平均住院时间(5.0±2.52) d,术后并发症发生率6.52%,均明显少于Open-TILF组(P< 0.05)。术后3 d、1个月、3个月、6个月应用日本矫形协会评分标准、视觉模拟评分、腰椎功能障碍指数法评分MIS-TLIF组均优于Open-TILF (P< 0.05);MIS-TLIF组术后并发症明显少于Open-TILF组(P< 0.05)。患者均获随访,时间> 6个月,X线检查未见椎弓根螺钉内固定系统的松动、断裂或移位。 结论 肥胖患者应用微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术与传统开放经椎间孔椎体间融合术均能达到良好的疗效,但MIS-TLIF组手术时间更短,创伤更小,出血量更少、短期腰痛发生率更低,并发症发生率更低,术后恢复更快。

     

    Abstract: Objective To study the clinical curative effect of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Open-TILF) on obesity patients (BMI> 30 kg/m2) with lumbar disc herniation. Methods Clinical data about 79 obese patients (BMI> 30 kg/m2) with lumbar disc herniation admitted to our hospital from January 2011 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients had undergone MIS-TLIF and Open-TILF treatment and they were divided into MIS-TLIF group (n=46) and Open-TILF group (n=33). The JOA, VAS and ODI score were applied to evaluate the clinical curative effect,average operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, length of incision, ambulation time, average hospitalization and complications of patients in two groups. Results No significant differences were found in general data of patients in two groups before operation (P> 0.05). Immediate postoperative X-ray films showed good position of internal fixator. In Open-TILF group, the amount of hemorrhage was (420±86) ml, incision length was (80±40) mm, postoperative ambulation time was (4.2±2.21) d, the average days in hospital were(9.3±3.40) d, and the average complication rate was 8%. While in MIS-TLIF group, the amount of hemorrhage was (110.83±50.51) ml,incision length was (2.5±0.18) cm, postoperative ambulation time was (24.37±8.50) h, the average hospitalization time was (5.0±2.52)d, and complication rate was 6.15%, all of which were significantly less than Open-TILF group (P< 0.05). The JOA, VAS, ODI scores of MIS-TLIF group were higher than that of Open-TILF group in 3 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after operation (P< 0.05), while the complication rate of MIS-TLIF group was significantly lower than Open-TILF group (P< 0.05). All patients were followed up for more than 6 months. X-ray examination showed no loosening, fracture or shift of pedicle screw internal fixation system. Conclusion Obese patients can achieve good efficacy with MIS-TLIF or Open-TILF treatment, but MIS-TLIF treatment shows shorter operation time,less trauma and bleeding volume, lower incidence of short-term pain, lower complication rate and faster postoperative recovery.

     

/

返回文章
返回