双源CT冠状静脉成像中前瞻性心电门控大螺距扫描与回顾性心电门控模式的图像质量及辐射剂量的比较

Image quality and radiation dose of retrospective electrocardiogram-gated spiral acquisition mode and prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode for dualsource CT of coronary venous system: A comparative study

  • 摘要: 目的 比较在冠状静脉CT成像中前瞻性心电门控大螺距扫描模式(flash spiral模式)与回顾性心电门控扫描模式在图像质量及辐射剂量上的差异。 方法 连续入选2013年9月-2014年9月于本院行心脏CT检查患者74例,对入选病例随机采用flash spiral模式及回顾性心电门控扫描模式进行螺旋CT冠状静脉血管成像,根据不同扫描模式,将入选患者分为FLASH组(flash spiral扫描模式,共39例)和RGH组(回顾性心电门控扫描模式,共35例),比较两组冠状静脉图像质量、对比噪声比(contrast-to-noise ratio,CNR)、辐射剂量的差异,比较两组患者在不同心率亚组中(心率< 65/min及心率≥65/min)冠状静脉图像质量、辐射剂量差异。 结果 FLASH组与RGH组基线资料及扫描参数差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。FLASH组冠状静脉图像评分、对比噪声比分别为3.3±1.3、7.0±3.2;RGH组的冠状静脉图像评分、对比噪声比分别为3.2±1.2、7.5±3.2,两组差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。进一步比较各心率段,两种扫描模式组冠状静脉的图像质量评分、对比噪声比差异亦无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。FLASH组有效辐射剂量较RGH组明显降低(0.8±0.2) mSv vs (7.2±2.7) mSv,P< 0.001。 结论 双源CT flash spiral扫描模式在冠状静脉成像中不影响图像质量且明显降低辐射剂量。

     

    Abstract: Objective To assess the image quality and effective radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram -gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode(flash mode)of coronary venous system angiography as compared with retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode. Methods A total of 74 patients undergoing MSCT in our hospital from September 2013 to September 2014 were divided into two groups according to the scanning mode at random, named FLASH group(flash spiral mode, n=39)and RGH group(retrospective ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode, n=35).The image quality scores, contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR), effective radiation dose and influencing factors on image quality between the two groups were assessed.The image quality and radiation dose of patients in two subgroups(heart rate<65 /min or ≥65 /min)were compared. Results Characteristics and scan parameters of patients in two groups had no significant difference.There were no significant differences in image quality scores and contrast-to-noise ratio between two groups image quality scores: 3.3±1.3(FLASH group)vs 3.2±1.2(RGH group), P> 0.05; CNR: 7.0±3.2(FLASH group)vs 7.5±3.2(RGH group), P> 0.05.Furthermore, the average image quality scores and mean CNR were similar between FLASH group and RGH group in spite of heart rate<65 /min or≥65 /min.The estimated radiation dose was(0.8±0.2)mSv in FLASH group and(7.2±2.7)mSv in RGH group(P<0.001). Conclusion Prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode provides a similar image quality to the retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode, with significant reduction of radiation exposure.

     

/

返回文章
返回