两种手术治疗股骨干骨折后骨不连的疗效分析

Efficacy of two kinds of operation for femoral shaft fractures nonunion

  • 摘要: 目的 回顾分析两种不同内固定方式治疗股骨干骨折后骨不连的疗效。 方法 2009年6月-2013年6月河北省人民医院应用不同内固定方式治疗的股骨干骨折后骨不连患者92例,依照手术方式不同,分为带锁髓内钉治疗组(n=48)和双钢板联合颗粒骨植入组(n=44);比较两组的一般资料、手术情况、骨折愈合情况及膝关节功能。 结果 两组患者骨不连均达到骨折愈合,但是带锁髓内钉治疗组切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间、术后引流量和骨折愈合时间均少于双钢板联合颗粒骨植入组(P< 0.05),带锁髓内钉治疗组的术后膝关节功能评分优于双钢板联合颗粒骨植入组(P< 0.05)。 结论 与双钢板联合颗粒骨植入比较,带锁髓内钉治疗具有操作简单、创伤小、手术时间短等优点。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze the efficacy of two different internal fixations for femoral shaft nonunion. Methods From June 2009 to June 2013, 92 cases with femoral shaft fracture bone nonunion were enrolled in our hospital.They were divided into two groups depending on the different methods of internal fixation, interlocking intramedullary nailing group(n=48)and double plate joint with granule bone implant group(n=44).The surgical situation, fracture healing time and functional evaluation of the knee joint were compared between two groups. Results All patients had achieved bone union at last, but in the interlocking intramedullary nail group, the length of the incision, blood loss, operative time, postoperative drainage and healing time were significantly less than those of double plate joint with granule bone implant group(P<0.05).In the interlocking intramedullary nail group, the postoperative knee function score was significantly higher than that of double plate joint with granule bone implant group(P<0.05). Conclusion The methods of interlocking intramedullary nail and double plate joint with granule bone implant are effective means for femoral shaft fracture nonunion, but interlocking intramedullary nail has a clear effect, simple operation process, smaller trauma and shorter surgery time.

     

/

返回文章
返回