应用子宫活性内膜评估宫腔粘连严重程度的初探

Role of receptible endometrium in assessing severity of intrauterine adhesions: A preliminary study

  • 摘要: 目的 应用子宫活性内膜评估宫腔粘连严重程度、预测术后妊娠结局,以验证新提出的宫腔粘连分类的临床适用性。 方法 回顾性分析2012年1月-2015年6月于海军总医院妇科住院行超声引导下宫腔粘连松解术(transcervical resection of adhesions,TCRA)并保留全程清晰手术视频的宫腔粘连(intrauterine adhesion,IUA)患者160例,术中手术医师按照欧洲妇科内镜协会(European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy,ESGE)宫腔粘连分类标准进行分级。该手术医师通过回顾手术视频按子宫活性内膜概念对IUA进行评估,根据子宫活性内膜面积将IUA分为A组(≥1/2,72例)、B组(1/4~1/2,34例)、C组(≤1/4,54例),分别对应轻、中、重度IUA,3组平均年龄分别为31.81±4.802岁、34.06±3.931岁和33.28±5.402岁。2015年8月电话随访术后妊娠结局,比较子宫活性内膜分类与ESGE分类的相关性及一致性,以及各级宫腔粘连术后妊娠结局的差异。 结果 我们提出的子宫活性内膜分级结果与ESGE分类结果具有较强相关性(r=0.799,P< 0.001),但一致性差(k=0.395,P< 0.001)。ESGE分类下的重度IUA按照子宫活性内膜分类标准也有粘连程度较重的趋势(χ2=64.332,P< 0.001)。144例IUA术后试孕,76例获得临床妊娠,其中6例妊娠2次,共计妊娠82次。A、B、C组术后妊娠率分别为69.7%(46/66)、51.6%(16/31)和29.8%(14/47),差异有统计学意义(P=0.015)。A、B、C组术后抱婴率分别为65.4%(34/52)、50.0%(8/16)和42.9%(6/14),差异无统计学意义(P=0.234);A、B、C组妊娠丢失率分别为17.3%(9/52)、31.3%(5/11)和28.6%(4/14),差异无统计学意义(P=0.403)。ESGE分类的轻、中、重度IUA与对应的A、B、C组比较,妊娠率、抱婴率及妊娠丢失率差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。 结论 子宫活性内膜面积单独评估IUA严重程度与ESGE分类结果具有良好相关性,但一致性较差,IUA术后妊娠结局与子宫活性内膜面积呈负相关。两种分级方法对宫腔粘连妊娠结局的预测能力相近。子宫活性内膜分级方法更简单,临床适用性可能更好。

     

    Abstract: Objective To assess the severity of intrauterine adhesions and predict postoperative pregnancy outcomes by receptible endometrium, so as to identify the value of the new method of classifying intrauterine adhesions. Methods Medical records of 160 patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUA) who had undergone transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA) with clear operation video in department of obstetrics & gynecology, Navy General Hospital from January 2012 to June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.During surgery, IUAs were classified according to European Society for Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classification of IUA.After reviewing the records, according to the area of retained receptible endometrium of uterine cavity, IUAs were classified into three groups by the same surgeon: group A (n=72) with the retained area of receptible endometrium≥ 1/2 of uterine cavity and average age of (31.81±4.802) years; group B (n=34), 1/4 to 1/2 of uterine cavity receptible endometrium were retained with average age of (34.06±3.931) years; group C (n=54), ≤ 1/4 of uterine cavity receptible endometrium were retained or tubular cavity without any receptible endometrium retained with average age of (33.28±5.402) years.Patients in group A, B and C were considered as mild, moderate and severe intrauterine adhesions, respectively.In August 2015, we telephoned all IUAs patients asking about their pregnancy outcomes.The findings of our classification and the pregnancy outcomes were compared with those of ESGE. Results Theseverity grade of IUA defined by our classification and ESGE classification was closely correlative (r=0.799, P< 0.001) but with poor consistent (k=0.395, P< 0.001).The more severe IUA defined by ESGE tended to be classified as more severe IUA in our classification (χ2=64.332, P< 0.001).There were 144 cases with IUA trying to be pregnant, and 76 cases got pregnancy successfully.Of the 76 cases, 6 cases had been pregnant for twice with the total pregnancy of 82 times.The postoperative pregnancy rate of group A, B and C were 69.7% (46/66), 51.6% (16/31) and 29.8% (14/47) with statistically significant difference (P=0.015).The rate of taking baby home were 65.4% (34/52), 50.0% (8/16) and 42.9% (6/14) in group A, B and C without statistically significant difference (P=0.234).The pregnancy loss rate of group A, B and C were 17.3% (9/52), 31.3% (5/11) and 28.6% (4/14) without statistically significant difference (P=0.403).The pregnancy rate, taking baby home rate and pregnancy loss rate of each IUA level between the two classifications were not significantly different (P> 0.05). Conclusion The severity grade of IUA defined by our classification is closely correlated with ESGE with poor consistent.It shows negative correlation between retained receptible endometrium area and postoperative pregnancy outcomes.The results of the two classifications in predicting pregnancy outcomes are similar, but our classification is more simple than ESGE's, and more applicable in clinical practice.

     

/

返回文章
返回