经阴道三维超声定量评估卵巢储备功能下降及卵巢早衰的价值

Value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in quantitative assessment on diminished ovarian reserve and premature ovarian failure

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨经阴道三维超声定量评估卵巢储备功能下降及卵巢早衰的价值。 方法 选择2014年10月- 2016年10月在我院进行超声检查的女性患者,根据性激素检查结果筛选出卵巢储备功能正常组(50例)、卵巢储备功能下降(diminished ovarian reserve,DOR)组(50例)、卵巢早衰(premature ovarian failure,POF)组(50例),行阴道三维能量多普勒成像,并应用VOCAL、Sono AVC分析软件比较窦卵泡计数(antral follicle number,AFC)、卵巢体积(ovarian volume,OV)、卵巢血管化指数(vascularization index,VI)、血流指数(blood flow index,FI)、血管化血流指数(vascularization flow index,VFI)等参数,绘制ROC曲线,计算曲线下面积,灵敏度、特异度,根据约登指数确定诊断临界值。 结果 3组间AFC、OV、VI、FI、VFI的差异均有统计学意义,且正常组> DOR组> POF组(P< 0.05)。正常组与DOR组相比:AFC的ROC曲线下面积为0.985,灵敏度和特异度分别为0.90、0.88;OV的ROC曲线下面积为0.933,灵敏度和特异度分别为1.00、0.52;VI的ROC曲线下面积为0.920,灵敏度和特异度分别为1.00、0.48;FI的ROC曲线下面积为0.913,灵敏度和特异度分别为1.00、0.56;VFI的ROC曲线下面积为0.941,灵敏度和特异度分别为1.00、0.48。DOR组和POF组相比:AFC的ROC曲线下面积为0.958,灵敏度和特异度分别为0.98、0.82;OV ROC曲线下面积为0.959,灵敏度和特异度分别为0.88、0.88;VI的ROC曲线下面积为0.886,灵敏度和特异度分别为1.00、0.48;FI的ROC曲线下面积为0.884,灵敏度和特异度分别为1.00、0.52;VFI的ROC曲线下面积为0.919,灵敏度和特异度分别为1.00、0.50。 结论 三维超声定量指标中AFC对于卵巢储备功能的预测价值最高,OV次之,卵巢血流灌注指标VI、FI、VFI对卵巢储备功能的预测价值有限。

     

    Abstract: Objective To study the value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in quantitative assessment on diminished ovarian reserve and premature ovarian failure. Methods Female patients with ovary dysfunction who underwent ultrasound examination in outpatient department of Chinese PLA General Hospital from October 2014 to October 2016 were enrolled. They were divided into normal ovarian reserve group(50 cases), decreased ovarian reserve group (50 cases) and premature ovarian failure group (50 cases)according to hormone level. All the patients accepted transvaginal three-dimensional power doppler ultrasound examination.VOCAL and SonoAVC were applied to compare antral follicle number (AFC) and ovarian volume(OV), vascularization ndex (VI), blood flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI). ROC analysis was adopted to evaluate the diagnostic value of hese parameters. Results There were significant differences between three groups in AFC, OV, VI, FI, VFI (normal group> DOR group> POF group, P< 0.05). In the comparison between normal group and DOR group, areas under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity for AFC were 0.985, 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. For OV, they were 0.933, 1.00 and 0.52, respectively. For VI, they were 0.920, 1.00, and 0.48, respectively. For FI, they were 0.913, 1.00 and 0.56, respectively. For VFI, they were 0.941, 1.00 and 0.48, espectively. In the comparison between DOR group and POF group, AUC, sensitivity, specificity for AFC were 0.958, 0.98 and 0.82, respectively. For OV, they were 0.959, 0.88 and 0.88, respectively. For VI, they were 0.886, 1.00 and 0.48, respectively. For FI, they were 0.884, 1.00 and 0.52, respectively. For VFI, they were 0.919, 1.00 and 0.50, respectively. Conclusion AFC is the best predictor for ovarian reserve function among all the parameters of quantitative three-dimensional ultrasound examination, followed by OV, and finally ovarian blood indexes (VI, FI and VFI).

     

/

返回文章
返回