两种手术方法治疗剖宫产子宫瘢痕憩室的临床疗效比较

Transvaginal versus hysteroscopic resection for treatment of cesarean scar diverticulum

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨经阴子宫瘢痕憩室(cesarean scar diverticulum,CSD)修补术在CSD患者治疗中的临床意义。 方法 选取解放军总医院妇产科2013年1月- 2017年1月收治的行手术治疗的子宫瘢痕憩室病例65例,根据手术方法分为两组,观察组采用经阴CSD切除修补术,对照组采用宫腹腔镜联合CSD切除修补术,比较两组基线资料、疗效和随访相关指标。 结果 观察组31例,对照组34例,两组年龄、剖宫产史、每月阴道流血时间以及子宫缺损处肌层厚度差异无统计学意义(P均> 0.05);观察组手术时间(74.3±22.5) min少于对照组的(103.5±36.4) min,手术出血量(54.0±28.2) ml少于对照组的(78.6±25.9) ml,住院费用(7 968.3±897.6)元少于对照组的(13 478.4±1 743.5)元,差异均有统计学意义(P均< 0.05);随访1个月时观察组治疗有效率为74.2%,对照组为58.8%(P> 0.05);随访6个月时观察组治疗有效率为87.1%,高于对照组的67.6%(P< 0.05)。 结论 对于子宫瘢痕憩室病例,经阴CSD切除修补术的手术时间、手术出血量和住院费用均少于宫腹腔镜联合手术,治疗效果也更确切。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the effect of transvaginal versus hysteroscopic resection on patients with cesarean scar diverticulum (CSD). Methods Sixty-five cases with CSD treated in Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2013 to January 2017 were selected and divided into two groups according to the operation methods. The study group underwent transvaginal CSD resection, while the control group underwent hysteroscopic combined with laparoscopic CSD resection. Baseline data and clinical outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, the history of cesarean section, the length of vaginal bleeding per month, and the thickness of myometrium in the uterus defect (All P > 0.05). The operating time (74.3±22.5) min vs (103.5±36.4) min, the amount of bleeding (54.0±28.2) ml vs(78.6±25.9) ml and the hospitalization expenses (7 968.3±897.6) yuan vs (13 478.4±1 743.5) yuan of the study group were shorter or less than those of the control group with statistically significant differences (All P< 0.05). After 1 month of follow-up, the effective rate of the study group was 74.2%, which was higher than that of the control group (58.8%) without significant difference(P> 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the effective rate of the study group was 87.1%, higher than 67.6% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of transvaginal CSD resection is superior to hysteroscopic combined with laparoscopic surgery with shorter operating time, less amount of bleeding and hospitalization expenses, which has important clinical value.

     

/

返回文章
返回