手法联合针刺治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的疗效及对血流动力学的影响

Manipulation combined with acupuncture for vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis and its influences on hemodynamics

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨手法联合针刺治疗椎动脉型颈椎病(vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis,CSA)的疗效及对血流动力学的影响。 方法 选取2014年1月- 2017年6月本院收治的CSA患者160例,按随机数表法分为观察组和对照组,每组各80例。对照组采用手法治疗,观察组在手法治疗的基础上加用针刺治疗。观察两组患者治疗后的临床疗效,并比较两组治疗前后的血流动力学变化。 结果 观察组治疗的总有效率明显高于对照组(95.0% vs 77.5%,P=0.001),且未见严重不良事件。两组患者治疗后的收缩期峰流速(Vs)、平均峰流速(Vm)、舒张期末血流速度(end diastolic velocity,EDV)均明显高于治疗前(P均< 0.05),且观察组的Vs(61.3±10.4) cm/s vs (50.8±8.6) cm/s、Vm(45.6±9.2) cm/s vs (33.8±8.7) cm/s及EDV(18.6±3.2) cm/s vs (16.4±2.8) cm/s均明显高于对照组(P< 0.05)。两组患者治疗后的全血黏度、血浆黏度及红细胞聚集指数均明显低于治疗前(P均< 0.05),且观察组的全血黏度、血浆黏度及红细胞聚集指数均明显低于对照组(P均< 0.05)。两组患者治疗后的搏动指数(pulsatility index,PI)、循环阻力指数(resistent index,RI)明显低于治疗前(P< 0.05),且观察组的PI(0.4±0.1 vs 0.6±0.2)及RI(0.3±0.1 vs 0.5±0.1)显著低于对照组(P< 0.05)。两组患者治疗后的眩晕、头痛、颈肩痛、日常生活及工作、心理及社会适应能力评分与治疗前比较,均明显改善(P均< 0.05),且观察组优于对照组(P< 0.05)。 结论 手法联合针刺治疗CSA患者的临床疗效较好,能有效改善患者的血流动力学,促进血液循环。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of manipulation plus acupuncture in the treatment of vertebral artery type cervical spondylosis (CSA) and its influences on hemodynamics. Methods One hundred and sixty CSA patients were selected from January 2014 to June 2017 in our hospital, and they were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 80 cases in each group. The control group was treated with manipulation, and the observation group was treated with manipulation plus acupuncture.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed and compared. The hemodynamic changes before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (95.0% vs 77.5%, P=0.001), and no serious adverse event was observed. The Vs, Vm and EDV in two groups significantly increased after treatment (all P < 0.05), and they were significantly higher in observation group than those in the control groupVs:(61.3±10.4) cm/s vs (50.8±8.6) cm/s; Vm:(45.6±9.2) cm/s vs (33.8±8.7) cm/s; EDV:(18.6±3.2) cm/s vs(16.4±2.8) cm/s; all P < 0.05. The PI and RI in two groups decreased significantly after treatment (all P < 0.05), and they were significantly lower in observation group than those in the control groupPI:(0.4±0.1) vs (0.6±0.2); RI:(0.3±0.1) vs(0.5±0.1); P < 0.05, respectively. The whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity and erythrocyte aggregation index of the two groups after treatment were significantly lower than before treatment (all P< 0.05), and they were significantly lower in observation group than those in the control group (all P< 0.05). After treatment, vertigo, headache, neck pain, daily life and work, psychological and social adaptation ability improved significantly in both two groups (all P< 0.05), and they were superior in observation group compared to control group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion Manipulation combined with acupuncture is effective on CSA patients, and it can effectively improve the hemodynamic changes and blood circulation.

     

/

返回文章
返回