解剖型腓骨髓内支撑锁定钢板固定肱骨近端骨折的有限元分析

Effect of locking compression plate with intramedullary anatomical fibular allograft on proximal humerus fractures: A finite element analysis

  • 摘要: 目的 通过有限元分析评估比较解剖型腓骨髓内支撑钢板固定(locking compression plate with anatomical fibularallograft,LCP-AF)、腓骨干髓内支撑钢板固定(locking compression plate with fibular shaft allograft,LCP-FS)、锁定钢板固定(locking plate fixation,LCP)治疗肱骨近端骨折的稳定性。方法 扫描骨质疏松肱骨近端CT数据,建立解剖型腓骨髓内支撑钢板固定、腓骨干髓内支撑钢板固定、锁定钢板固定治疗肱骨近端骨折的三种有限元模型,同时将肱骨的骨质类型分为骨质疏松和骨质正常,然后给予轴向200 N的加载力量,通过有限元分析评估三种内固定模型的结构稳定性。结果 在结构的稳定性方面LCP-AF、LCP-FS分别是LCP的3.88倍、3.51倍;内置物承受的应力方面LCP分别是LCP-AF、LCP-FS的5.72倍、5.35倍;骨折断端的移位大小LCP的位移最大,LCP-AF、LCP-FS、LCP模型中A点的位移分别为0.33 mm、0.39 mm、3.17 mm。结论 解剖型腓骨髓内支撑钢板固定模型力学稳定性更好。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the stabilization of three fixation methods, including locking compression plate with anatomical fibular allograft(LCP-AF), locking compression plate with fibular shaft allograft(LCP-FS) and locking compression plate fixation(LCP), for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures by finite element analysis. Methods The CT imaging data of osteoporotic proximal humerus were collected, and then finite element models of three fixation methods were established. The humerus were divided into osteoporotic bone and normal bone. Then, a loading force of 200 N in the axial direction was given, and the structural stability of the three internal fixation models was evaluated by finite element analysis. Results Structural stability in LCP-AF and LCP-FS were 3.88 times and 3.51 times of that in LCP, and maximum von Mises stress were 5.72 times and 5.35 times. The displacement of point A in the fracture region was the greatest in LCP, with 0.33 mm, 0.39 mm, 3.17 mm in LCP-AF, LCP-FS, and LCP,respectively. Conclusion The result of finite element analysis shows that LCP-AF model has better structural stability.

     

/

返回文章
返回