钢板固定腓骨对闭合性胫骨远端骨折髓内钉固定术疗效的影响

Effect of fibular plate fixation on outcome of closed ipsilateral distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨对于闭合性胫骨远端骨折合并同侧腓骨骨折的患者,在进行胫骨髓内钉固定的同时是否需要一并固定腓骨。方法 回顾性分析我中心2010年9月-2017年9月收治的62例闭合性胫骨远端骨折合并同侧腓骨骨折的患者,并分为两组:腓骨固定组28例接受胫骨髓内钉联合腓骨钢板治疗,腓骨不固定组34例仅接受胫骨髓内钉治疗,比较两组术后疗效和并发症的差异。结果 两组在术中对位对线、随访终点对位对线、复位丢失、延迟愈合、不愈合和感染方面,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论 对于闭合性胫骨远端骨折合并同侧腓骨骨折,采用钢板腓骨固定对最终的临床疗效和并发症无显著影响,故而不推荐常规行腓骨固定。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate whether supplemental fibular plate fixation will affect the clinical outcomes of closed ipsilateral distal tibia fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. Methods Sixty-two patients with closed tibia-fibular fractures admitted to our hospital from September 2010 to September 2017 were included in our study. Twenty-eight patients with fibular fixation(case group)were treated by tibia nailing combined with fibular plate fixation, and thirty-four patients without fibular fixation(control group) were treated by tibia nailing alone. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between two groups. Results There was no difference in tibia malalignment, loss of reduction, delayed union, nonunion and infection between two groups(P> 0.05). Conclusion In our study, fibular plate fixation has no advantage in treating closed ipsilateral distal tibia fractures with intramedullary nailing, thus it is not recommended to be a routine procedure.

     

/

返回文章
返回