重组人粒细胞刺激因子在晚期儿童神经母细胞瘤化疗后早期预防性应用的疗效观察

Prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor in children with high-risk neuroblastoma after chemotherapy

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨晚期儿童神经母细胞瘤化疗后预防性应用重组人粒细胞刺激因子(recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor,rhG-CSF)的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2013年1月-2018年7月在解放军总医院第一医学中心小儿内科诊断为神经母细胞瘤的62例患儿临床资料,其中Ⅲ期11例,Ⅳ期51例(28例合并骨髓转移),所有患儿第1疗程均采用CDV(环磷酰胺+柔红霉素+长春新碱)方案化疗。根据患儿rhG-CSF使用情况,将其分为早期预防组(29例)和常规治疗组(33例)。早期预防组在停化疗24 h后立即予以rhG-CSF刺激骨髓造血,常规治疗组在出现粒细胞缺乏后再予以rhG-CSF刺激骨髓造血。rhG-CSF按5μg/(kg·d)的剂量给药,直至ANC> 1.5×109/L时停用。比较两组患儿粒细胞缺乏持续时间、下一疗程化疗间隔时间、院内感染持续时间。结果 早期预防组和常规治疗组化疗后均发生粒细胞缺乏,但早期预防组粒细胞缺乏持续时间低于常规治疗组(8.6±1.9) d vs (13.3±2.2) d,P=0.010。早期预防组下一疗程化疗间隔时间(25.1±4.6) d vs (30.3±8.3) d,P=0.04和下一疗程化疗推迟率(17.2%vs 51.5%,P=0.005)均低于常规治疗组。早期预防组与常规治疗组总体感染率无统计学差异(86.2%vs 93.9%, P=0.304),但感染持续时间低于常规治疗组(6.3±3.8) d vs (8.2±3.5) d,P=0.048。62例患儿在使用rhG-CSF后均未出现rhG-CSF相关不良反应。结论 晚期儿童神经母细胞瘤化疗后早期预防性使用rhG-CSF能为患儿带来良好的临床获益。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effects of prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor(rhGCSF) treatment on high-risk neuroblastoma in children after chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data about 62 children with neuroblastoma admitted to the first medical center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2013 to July 2018. Of them, 11 cases were in stage Ⅲ, and 51 cases were in stage Ⅳ with 28 cases had bone marrow metastasis. All children were treated with CDV protocol(cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine), and they were divided into two groups, prophylactic group(n=29) with prophylactic use of rhG-CSF on the first and second day after chemotherapy, and control group(n=33) who received rhG-CSF after neutropenia developed. All children received a dose of 5μg/kg of rhG-CSF until ANC >1.5×109/L. The duration of neutropenia and infection, interval between courses of chemotherapy in two groups were comparatively analyzed. Results The incidence of neutropenia in both two groups were 100%. The prophylactic group had a shorter duration of neutropenia(8.6±1.9 d vs 13.3±2.2 d, P=0.010), a shorter interval between courses of chemotherapy(25.1±4.6 d vs 30.3±8.3 d,P=0.04) and a lower incidence of treatment delay(17.2% vs 51.5%, P=0.05) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in infection rates between two groups(86.2% vs 93.9%, P=0.30), but the duration of infection was longer in the prophylactic group than that of the control group(6.3±3.8 d vs 8.2±3.5 d, P=0.048). No adverse reaction was found after the application of rhG-CSF in 62 patients. Conclusion The prophylactic use of rhG-CSF after chemotherapy is effective and safe for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

     

/

返回文章
返回