不同入路选择对切除鞍结节脑膜瘤效果的影响

Pterygoid approach versus subfrontal approach in resection of tuberculum sellae meningioma

  • 摘要: 目的 比较经翼点入路与额下入路对切除鞍结节脑膜瘤效果的影响。方法 选取2010年5月-2018年5月佛山市第一人民医院神经外科收治的76例鞍结节脑膜瘤患者的临床资料,根据入路方式将经翼点手术入路设为A组(n=34),额下手术入路设为B组(n=42)。比较两组手术时间和术中出血量、住院时间和肿瘤切除效果、视力改善及术后并发症情况。结果 A组Ⅰ级切除率、Ⅱ级切除率、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间与B组的比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组视力提高率为76.47%,高于B组的71.43%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组术后并发症发生率为17.65%(6/34),略低于B组的19.04%(8/42),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 应根据鞍结节脑膜瘤形态、大小和位置及与周围组织的关系来确定手术入路,翼点与额下入路在鞍结节脑膜瘤切除方面效果基本相同,在住院时间、视力改善和术后并发症发生率方面无明显差异。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical effect of pterygoid approach versus subfrontal approach in the resection of tuberculum sellae meningioma. Methods Totally 76 patients with tuberculum sella meningioma treated by microsurgery in our hospital from May 2010 to May 2018 were selected.According to the approach method,they were divided into pterygoid approach group (group A,n=34) and subfrontal approach group (group B,n=42).The operating time,intraoperative bleeding volume,hospitalization time,degree of resection,visual acuity improvement and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the proportions of gradeⅠresection and gradeⅡresection,operating time,intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05).The improvement of visual acuity in group A was 76.47%,which was higher than that in group B (71.43%),without significant difference (P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications was 17.65% (6/34) in group A,which was a little lower than that in group B (19.04%,8/42),and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Surgical approach selection for tuberculum sellae meningioma should be based on the characteristics of the tumor and its relationship with the surrounding tissues.No difference is found in tumor resection degree,hospital stay,visual acuity improvement and postoperative complications between the two approaches.

     

/

返回文章
返回