应用同视机检查评估间歇性外斜视儿童双眼视功能

Evaluation of binocular visual function in children with intermittent exotropia by synoptophore examination

  • 摘要:
      背景  儿童视力问题一直是家长乃至社会关注的热点,近年来各医院门诊间歇性外斜视儿童病例也比较常见,但国内外相关的研究多集中在手术及术后训练效果上。
      目的  应用同视机测量间歇性外斜视患者同时视重合点、融合范围以及双眼远立体视的改变,分析其双眼三级视功能特征,为尽早明确病情、及时进行手术治疗提供依据。
      方法  回顾性分析2019年5月1日- 2020年5月10日于解放军总医院第一医学中心眼科斜弱视门诊就诊的儿童103例,其中基本型间歇性外斜视55例(间歇性外斜视组),同期就诊的正常儿童48例为正常对照组。所有儿童采用日本Inami公司生产的L-2510B同视机检查,屈光不正者在矫正后进行,包括同时视、融合视及双眼远立体视,记录各组检查结果并分析其特征,其中间歇性外斜视组分析不同屈光状态、年龄、斜视角大小和集合性融合大小的远立体视情况。
      结果  与正常对照组相比,间歇性外斜视组的同时视重合点为(−11.89±3.20)°,较正常对照组明显向外偏移(−0.24±1.97)°(P<0.05);散开性融合(−4.37±1.39)°与正常对照组(−4.81±1.13)°相对一致(P>0.05);集合性融合(4.40±3.02)°较正常对照组(12.22±4.63)°明显缩小(P<0.05),融合范围的均值为(8.77±3.16)°,显著低于正常对照组(17.03±4.79)°(P<0.05);远立体视阳性率(33/55,60%)明显低于正常对照组(48/48,100%)(P<0.05)。间歇性外斜视患者中,大斜视角度患者远立体视丢失率(58.33%)明显高于小斜视角度患者(20.00%)(P<0.05);集合性融合范围小的患者远立体视丢失率(48.84%)明显高于集合性融合范围大的患者(8.33%)(P<0.05);年龄及屈光状态不同对远立体视影响较小(P>0.05)。
      结论  间歇性外斜视患者同视机检查三级视功能结果呈特征性改变:同时视重合点明显外偏移、集合性融合及融合范围的绝对值明显缩小,双眼远立体视丢失率明显增加,且斜视角度越大、集合性融合能力越差,远立体视功能越差。

     

    Abstract:
      Background  In recent years, vision problems in children have attracted more and more attention from their parents and the whole society, and children with intermittent exotropia are commonly seen in hospitals. However, related studies in China and globally mainly focus on the effect of surgery and postoperative training.
      Objective  To measure the changes of simultaneous vision (coincidence points), fusion range, and distance stereoacuity in children with intermittent exotropia by using synoptophore, and analyze the features of triple visual function in both eyes, so as to provide evidences for early diagnosis and timely surgical treatment.
      Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data about 103 children who visited the ophthalmic clinic for oblique amblyopia in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from May 1, 2019 to May 10, 2020. Of the 103 cases, 55 children had basic-type intermittent exotropia served as intermittent exotropia group, and the other 48 children with normal vision who attended the hospital during the same period were enrolled as normal control group. The L-2510B synoptophore manufactured by Inami, Japan, was used for the examination to all the children, and the children with refractive error underwent this examination after correction. Simultaneous vision, fusion vision, and distance stereoacuity of both eyes were recorded to analyze related features. For the intermittent exotropia group, distance stereoacuity was compared between the children with different refractive status, ages, strabismus angles, and collective fusions.
      Results  Compared with the normal control group, the intermittent exotropia group had a significant outward shift of simultaneous vision (coincidence points) (−11.89° ± 3.20° vs −0.24° ± 1.97°, P<0.05). Diffuse fusion was consistent between the intermittent exotropia group and the normal control group (−4.37° ± 1.39° vs −4.81° ± 1.13°, P>0.05). Compared with the normal control group, the intermittent exotropia group had a significant reduction in collective fusion (4.40° ± 3.02° vs 12.22° ± 4.63°, P<0.05), a significantly smaller fusion range (8.77° ± 3.16° vs 17.03° ± 4.79°, P<0.05), and a significantly lower positive rate of distance stereoacuity 60% (33/55) vs 100% (48/48), P<0.05. For the children with intermittent exotropia, the children with a large strabismus angle had a significantly higher loss rate of distance stereoacuity than those with a small strabismus angle (58.33% vs 20.00%, P<0.05); the children with a small range of collective fusion had a significantly higher loss rate of distance stereoacuity than those with a large range of collective fusion (48.84% vs 8.33%, P<0.05); however, age and refractive status had little influence on distance stereoacuity (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  There are characteristic changes in the results of visual function parameters in patients with intermittent exotropia, i.e., significant outward shift of simultaneous vision (coincidence points), significant reductions in the absolute values of collective fusion and fusion range, and a significant increase in the loss rate of distance stereoacuity. The ability of collective fusion and the function of distance stereoacuity tend to get worse with the increase in strabismus angle.

     

/

返回文章
返回