机器人与腹腔镜根治术治疗SiewertⅡ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌的疗效比较及预后影响因素分析

Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted radical resection for Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction and associated factors

  • 摘要:
      背景  全球食管胃结合部肿瘤的发病率不断上升,但有关机器人辅助治疗SiewertⅡ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部肿瘤的报道较少。了解SiewertⅡ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部肿瘤患者术后疗效及预后的影响因素,有助于提高患者的术后生存。
      目的  比较机器人与腹腔镜肿瘤根治术治疗SiewertⅡ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌患者的疗效,探究影响患者预后的风险因素。
      方法  回顾性分析解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外二科2014年1月- 2019年8月收治的111例SiewertⅡ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌患者的临床资料,其中机器人组50例,腹腔镜组61例。分析两组患者生存情况,应用Cox回归模型对远期疗效进行单因素和多因素分析。
      结果  两组临床病理资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与腹腔镜组相比,机器人组手术时间更长(231.7 ± 43.2) min vs (192.1 ± 44.0) min,P<0.001,但术后拔除胃管时间更短(7.1 ± 1.4) d vs (8.5 ± 2.9) d,P=0.001。两组的淋巴结清扫数目、术中失血量、肿瘤距远端切缘距离、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。机器人组和腹腔镜组的3年无病生存率分别为74.1%和65.4%,3年总生存率分别为79.5%和73.0%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肿瘤的Siewert分型(HR:2.605,95% CI:1.805~6.255)、T分期(HR:3.075,95% CI:1.408~6.714)、N分期(HR:2.060,95% CI:1.206~4.303)、手术切缘(HR:4.258,95% CI:1.245~14.562)与患者无病生存期独立关联。年龄(HR:4.178,95% CI:1.394~12.524)、TNM分期(HR:2.568,95% CI:1.009~6.539)、肿瘤大小(HR:3.504,95% CI:1.254~9.791)与患者总生存独立关联。
      结论  机器人与腹腔镜辅助治疗SiewertⅡ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部肿瘤的近期与远期疗效相近,临床医生应结合影响患者术后远期疗效的危险因素开展诊疗,以改善患者的预后。

     

    Abstract:
      Background  The incidence of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction increases around the world. At present, there are few studies reporting robot-assisted treatment of Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Understanding the associated factors that affect the patients' postoperative prognosis will improve the postoperative survival.
      Objective  To compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic treatment of Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.
      Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed to the medical records of 111 patients with Siewert Type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction admitted to the Department of General Surgery Ⅱ, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2014 to August 2019. The patients were divided into robotic group (n=50) and laparoscopic group (n=61). The clinicopathological data and perioperative variables of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Follow-up was mainly by telephone, text message, and outpatient service to obtain the survival status of patients. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to analyze the survival of patients, and the Cox regression model was applied for univariate and multivariate analysis of the factors associated with prognosis.
      Results  There was no significant difference in the clinicopathological data between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the laparoscopic group, the operating time was longer in the robotic group (231.7 ± 43.2 min vs 192.1 ± 44.0 min, P<0.001), but the time to remove gastric tube was shorter (7.1 ± 1.4 days vs 8.5 ± 2.9 days, P=0.001). No significant difference was found in the number of lymph node excised, intraoperative blood loss, distance from the tumor to the distal resection margin, intestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rate (P>0.05). The robotic group and the laparoscopic group had similar 3-year survival rate (79.5% vs 73.0%) and disease-free survival rate (DFS) (74.1% vs 65.4%)(P>0.05). Siewert type of tumor (HR: 2.605, 95% CI: 1.805-6.255), T stage (HR: 3.075, 95% CI: 1.408-6.714), N stage (HR: 2.060, 95% CI: 1.206-4.303), positive margin (HR: 4.258, 95% CI: 1.245-14.562) were independently associated with DFS. Age (HR: 4.178, 95% CI: 1.394-12.524), TNM stage (HR: 2.568, 95% CI: 1.009-6.539), tumor size (HR: 3.504, 95% CI: 1.254-9.791) were independently associated with overall survival.
      Conclusion  Robotic treatment has similar effect with laparoscopic-assisted treatment for Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surgeons should combine treatment with risk factors affecting patients' postoperative outcomes to improve their long-term prognosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回