基于CT测量指标的张力性气胸急救穿刺针合适长度及穿刺入路的研究

Determining optimal needle length and placement site for decompression of tension pneumothorax in young adults based on computed tomography measurements

  • 摘要:
      背景  张力性气胸最常用的一线急救装备是穿刺减压针。国外对于气胸穿刺针的长度有具体推荐数值,而我国目前尚缺乏相关研究及数据。
      目的  利用胸部CT影像测量的胸壁厚度数据,为制订适合中国人群的气胸穿刺减压针的长度及穿刺位置提供客观数据。
      方法  回顾分析2019年解放军总医院第一医学中心胸外科18~40岁不同性别住院患者的CT图像,使用美迪康图像存档和通信系统软件,分别测量左、右双侧前入路(锁骨中线第2肋间)穿刺点及侧入路(腋前线第5肋间)穿刺点的胸壁厚度(mm),并对数据进行统计学分析。
      结果  共纳入294例研究对象,男性135例,女性159例,平均年龄(33.76 ± 5.41)岁。前入路胸壁厚度为13.20~69.09 mm,侧入路胸壁厚度为8.19~52.70 mm。对于同一侧而言,前入路平均胸壁厚度大于侧入路平均胸壁厚度右侧(35.33 ± 9.62) mm vs (23.17 ± 7.14) mm,左侧(34.91 ± 9.65) mm vs (22.59 ±7.43) mm,P均<0.01。对同一测量点,女性平均胸壁厚度均大于男性右侧前入路(36.57 ± 10.11) mm vs (33.88 ± 8.83) mm,右侧侧入路(24.53 ± 7.84) mm vs (21.55 ± 5.85) mm,左侧前入路(36.19 ± 10.23) mm vs (33.41 ± 8.71) mm,左侧侧入路(23.98 ± 8.15) mm vs (20.95 ± 6.11) mm;P均<0.01;超重者体质量指数(body mass index,BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m2平均胸壁厚度均大于非超重者(BMI<24 kg/m2)右侧前入路(40.57 ± 9.93) mm vs (31.24 ± 7.08) mm,右侧侧入路(26.17 ± 7.12) mm vs (20.82 ± 6.24) mm,左侧前入路(40.23 ± 9.93) mm vs (30.75 ± 7.05) mm,左侧侧入路(25.68 ± 7.56) mm vs (20.17 ± 6.37) mm;P均<0.01。胸壁厚度与BMI呈正相关 (P均<0.01)。
      结论  穿刺针长度为70 mm时才能够保证穿刺成功,穿刺时需要综合考虑性别、BMI、入路等因素,侧入路可以作为张力性气胸穿刺减压的备选方案。

     

    Abstract:
      Background  The most commonly used first-aid equipment for tension pneumothorax is decompression needle. There are recommended values for the length of needle in foreign countries. However related research and data are absent in China.
      Objective  To analyze the average chest wall thickness (CWT) based on computed tomography, and determine the optimal length and inserting site of pneumothorax decompression needle suitable for young Chinese adults.
      Methods  A retrospective radiographic analysis was performed in patients aged from 18 to 40 years old admitted to the department of thoracic surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January to December in 2019. The CWT was measured at the anterior approach puncture point (the 2nd intercostal space of midclavicular line) and the lateral approach puncture point (the 5th intercostal space of anterior axillary line) bilaterally using Medicare picture archiving and communication system. Three needles with different sizes were evaluated regarding sufficient length for decompression and the data were analyzed statistically.
      Results  Among the 294 eligible subjects, there were 135 males and 159 females, with average age of 33.76 ± 5.41 yrs. The CWT of the anterior approach ranged from 13.20 mm to 69.09 mm, and that of the lateral approach ranged from 8.19 mm to 52.70 mm. For the same side, mean CWT of anterior approach was greater than that of lateral approach (right: 35.33 ± 9.62 mm vs 23.17 ± 7.14 mm; left: 34.91 ± 9.65 mm vs 22.59 ± 7.43 mm; P<0.01, respectively). For the same puncture point, the mean CWT of women was greater than that of men (right anterior approach (36.57 ± 10.11 mm vs 33.88 ± 8.83 mm, right lateral approach: 24.53 ± 7.84 mm vs 21.55 ± 5.85 mm; left anterior approach: 36.19 ± 10.23 mm vs 33.41 ± 8.71 mm, left lateral approach: 23.98 ± 8.15 mm vs 20.95 ± 6.11 mm; P<0.01, respectively), and the mean CWT of overweight patients (BMI ≥ 24) was greater than that of non-overweight patients (BMI<24) (right anterior approach: 40.57 ± 9.93 mm vs 31.24 ± 7.08 mm, right lateral approach: 26.17 ± 7.12 mm vs 20.82 ± 6.24 mm, left anterior approach: 40.23 ± 9.93 mm vs 30.75 ± 7.05 mm; left lateral approach: 25.68 ± 7.56 mm vs 20.17 ± 6.37 mm, P<0.01, respectively). The CWT was positively correlated with BMI (all P<0.01).
      Conclusion  A 70 mm needle would have reached the pleural space in 100% of subjects in this case series. Gender, BMI, approach and other factors should be taken into consideration during thoracentesis. The lateral approach may be an alternative choice in first aid for tension pneumothorax.

     

/

返回文章
返回