个性化股骨远端外旋截骨在膝关节置换治疗骨性关节炎中的应用

Application of personalized distal femoral external rotation osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis

  • 摘要:
      背景  在人工全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)中股骨假体的旋转力线至关重要,术中确定股骨远端外旋截骨的方法较多,各有利弊,目前无统一标准。
      目的  评价个性化股骨远端外旋截骨在膝关节置换治疗膝关节骨性关节炎中的应用价值。
      方法   1)采用尸体解剖实验验证CT测量股骨后髁角的可靠性。取10具成人尸体膝关节标本,行膝关节三维CT重建,测量股骨后髁连线(posterior condylar line,PCL)与股骨外科上髁轴(surgical transepicondylar axis,sTEA)之间的夹角,定义为后髁角(posterior condylar angle,PCA)。膝关节标本解剖,模拟TKA,肉眼定位确定sTEA和PCL的4个标记点,用大头针圆头标记,再行膝关节三维CT重建,根据标记点确定PCL和sTEA,测量二者夹角,即PCA’,计算两组角度差异有无统计学意义。2)个性化股骨远端外旋截骨行TKA的临床研究。选取2019年12月- 2020年8月阜阳市人民医院骨科收治的101例膝关节骨性关节炎患者,根据股骨远端旋转截骨方法不同随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组参照术前测量PCA行个性化股骨远端外旋截骨完成TKA,对照组采用常规股骨远端外旋3°截骨行TKA。术前测量膝内翻角、胫骨近端内侧角(medial proximal tibial angle,MPTA)、疼痛评分、膝关节活动度(range of motion,ROM)和膝关节协会评分(Knee Society Score,KSS)。术中记录膝关节屈曲90°位软组织平衡情况、髌骨轨迹是否良好。术后测量股骨假体旋转误差和膝内翻角;记录术后3个月和术后1年随访时膝内翻角、疼痛评分、ROM和KSS评分,评价临床疗效。
      结果  解剖学研究中PCA为4.2°±1.3°,PCA’为4.3°±0.9°,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。临床研究中,观察组51例男性8例,女性43例,年龄50 ~ 84(66.9±7.1)岁,对照组50例男性8例,女性42例,年龄56 ~ 83 (67.8±6.4)岁,均成功获得随访。两组测量PCA为4.13°±1.19°,大于常规应用的外旋3°(P<0.05)。两组手术时间和围术期出血量相近。在膝关节屈曲90°位软组织平衡方面,观察组仅6例出现初始屈曲间隙不平衡,优于对照组的15例(P<0.05)。观察组和对照组术后膝内翻角均中位数为1(IQR:1,2)°,较术前Md(IQR):7(3,14)°,8(3,14)°明显改善(P<0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组股骨假体旋转误差中位数0(IQR:0,3)°较对照组Md(IQR):1(1,4)°小(P<0.05)。两组术后3个月和术后1年随访时膝关节疼痛评分、ROM、KSS评分较术前明显改善(P<0.025);组间比较,观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。
      结论  术前采用膝关节三维CT重建测量PCA方法可靠。PCA具有个体化差异,采用个性化股骨远端外旋截骨可获得更好的屈曲间隙平衡,减少术后疼痛发生,提高膝关节活动度和临床疗效。

     

    Abstract:
      Background  The rotation alignment of the femoral prosthesis is very important in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are many methods to determine the external rotation osteotomy of the distal femur, each has its own advantages and disadvantages, without any unified standards.
      Objective  To evaluate the application value of personalized distal femoral external rotation osteotomy in TKA in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.
      Methods  Ten adult knee joint specimens were taken for three-dimensional CT reconstruction. The angle between the posterior condylar line (PCL) and the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) was measured, that was defined as the posterior condylar angle (PCA). The cadaver specimens of the knee joint were dissected, and then TKA was simulated, the four points determining the sTEA and PCL were identified by the naked eyes and were marked by round head of pins. Then three-dimensional CT reconstruction of knee joint was performed. According to the marked points, PCL and sTEA were determined, and the angle between them was measured, which was defined as PCA’. The difference of angle between the two groups was compared. From December 2019 to August 2020, 101 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomly divided into observation group and control group according to different methods of distal femoral rotation osteotomy. Depending on the PCA which was measured preoperatively, individualized external rotation osteotomy of the distal femur was performed in the observation group to complete TKA, while conventional 3° external rotation osteotomy of distal femur was applied in the control group. The knee varus angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), pain score, range of motion (ROM) and KSS score were measured before operation. During the operation, the soft tissue balance of 90° knee flexion and whether the patellofemoral track was good or not were recorded. The rotation error of femoral prosthesis and knee varus angle were measured after operation, and the knee varus angle, pain score, ROM and KSS were recorded at 3 months and 1 year after operation, and the clinical effect was evaluated.
      Results  In anatomical research, PCA was 4.2°±1.3° and PCA 'was 4.3°±0.9°, without significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). In clinical research, there were 51 cases in the observation group, including 8 males and 43 females, aged 50-84 (66.9±7.1) years, and 50 patients in the control group, including 8 males and 42 females, aged 56-83 (67.8±6.4) years. All of them were followed up successfully. The PCA of the two groups was 4.13°±1.19°, which was higher than 3° (P<0.05). The operation time and perioperative blood loss of the two groups were similar. In the aspect of soft tissue balance of knee flexion 90°, only 6 cases in the observation group had initial flexion gap imbalance, which was better than 15 cases in the control group (P<0.05). The medians of postoperative knee varus angle in both the observation group and the control group are 1(IQR: 1, 2)°, which were significantly better than that those before operation (MdIQR: 73, 14°, 83, 14°) (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05). The rotation error of femoral prosthesis in the observation group (MdIQR: 00, 3°) was lower than that in the control group (MdIQR: 11, 4°) (P<0.05). The knee joint pain score, ROM and KSS of the two groups improved significantly at 3 months and 1 year after operation (P<0.025), and these indexes in observation group were better than that of the control group (P<0.05).
      Conclusion  The method of measuring PCA with three-dimensional CT reconstruction is reliable. PCA is different in different people. Individualized external rotation osteotomy of the distal femur can achieve better balance of flexion space, reduce the incidence of postoperative pain, and improve the range of motion and clinical effect of TKA.

     

/

返回文章
返回