强直性脊柱炎患者合并附着点炎的临床特征分析

Clinical characteristics of patients with ankylosing spondylitis combined enthesitis

  • 摘要:
      背景  强直性脊柱炎(ankylosing spondylitis,AS)是一种主要累及中轴骨的慢性炎症性疾病,附着点炎是AS最重要的病理特征,也是其区别于类风湿关节炎等其他关节炎症性疾病的关键。目前国内尚缺乏关于AS合并附着点炎的大样本临床研究。
      目的  通过比较AS患者合并与未合并附着点炎的临床表现差异,探讨附着点炎在AS患者病情判断与预后中的意义。
      方法  从脊柱关节炎智能移动管理系统中收录2016年4月13日- 2019年1月15日就诊于解放军总医院第一医学中心风湿免疫科门诊的AS患者1 426例,其中当次就诊附着点炎评估资料完整的AS患者1 083例,分析合并附着点炎与未合并附着点炎AS患者人口学特征、临床表现、实验室检查和疾病严重程度评价的差异。
      结果  1 083例中,男性890例,女性193例,年龄29.0(24.0,35.0)岁。其中合并附着点炎304例,未合并附着点炎779例,合并附着点炎者中位发病年龄低于未合并者Md(IQR):20.0(17.0,25.0)岁 vs 21.0(17.0,27.0)岁,P=0.022。合并附着点炎者病程中更易出现前胸壁受累52.0% (156/300) vs 43.7% (330/755),P=0.015和足跟受累38.3% (115/300) vs 31.1% (235/755),P=0.025,且更易出现外周关节炎22.7% (69/304) vs 12.2% (95/779),P < 0.001。合并附着点炎者总体背痛Md(IQR):3.0(2.0,4.0) vs 2.0(1.0,4.0),P < 0.001、夜间背痛程度Md(IQR):2.0(1.0,4.0) vs 2.0(1.0,4.0),P=0.001、胸廓扩张受限比21.4%(65/304) vs 14.9%(116/779),P=0.010、患者整体评价评分Md(IQR):3.0(2.0,5.0) vs 2.0(1.0,4.0),P < 0.001、医生整体评价评分Md(IQR):2.0(2.0,3.0) vs 2.0(1.0,3.0),P=0.024、Bath AS测量指数Md(IQR):1.0(0.0,3.0) vs 1.0(0.0,3.0),P=0.049、Bath AS疾病活动指数Md(IQR):2.7(1.5,4.0) vs 1.9(1.0,3.1),P < 0.001、Bath AS功能指数Md(IQR):1.5(0.4,2.9) vs 1.2(0.2,2.4),P=0.008和国际脊柱关节炎评价协会健康指数Md(IQR):6.0(3.3,9.0) vs 5.0(2.0,8.0),P < 0.001均高于未合并附着点炎者。多元logistic回归分析结果显示既往存在前胸壁痛(OR=1.428,95% CI:1.084 ~ 1.881,P=0.011)和外周关节炎(OR=2.166,95% CI:1.521 ~ 3.086,P < 0.001)是出现附着点炎的危险因素。
      结论  合并附着点炎的AS患者发病早,更易出现外周关节受累,疾病活动度更高,机体功能状态和健康情况更差。

     

    Abstract:
      Background  Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that primarily involves the axial bones. Enthesitis, which is the most important pathological feature of AS, distinguishes it from other inflammatory joint diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. However, there are few clinical studies on AS patients with enthesitis in China.
      Objective  To explore the significance of enthesitis in evaluating the condition and prognosis of AS patients by comparing the clinical manifestations of AS patients with or without enthesitis.
      Methods  A total of 1 083 AS patients with complete assessment of enthesitis were recruited from Smart phone Spondyloarthritis management system (SpAMS) from April 13, 2016 to January 15, 2019 in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital. The differences in demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, laboratory data and disease severity between patients with or without enthesitis were analyzed.
      Results  Of the 1 083 patients with AS, there were 890 males and 193 females with the average age of 29.0 (24.0, 35.0) years. There were 304 patients with enthesitis and 779 patients without enthesitis. The age of disease onset was younger in patients with enthesitis than patients without enthesitis (Md IQR: 20.0 17.0, 25.0 years vs 21.0 17.0, 27.0 years, P=0.022). Compared with patients without enthesitis, patients with enthesitis had more frequent involvement of anterior chest wall (52.0% 156/300 vs 43.7% 330/755, P= 0.015) and heel (38.3% 115/300 vs 31.1% 235/755, P=0.025) during the course of disease. Peripheral arthritis (22.7% 69/304 vs 12.2% 95/779, P < 0.001) were more common in patients with enthesitis. AS patients with enthesitis had higher degree of general back pain (MdIQR: 3.0 2.0, 4.0 vs 2.0 1.0, 4.0, P < 0.001), dorsalgia at night (MdIQR: 2.0 1.0, 4.0vs 2.0 1.0, 4.0,P=0.001), limitation of thoracic dilatation (21.4% 65/304 vs 14.9% 116/779, P=0.010), Patient Global Assessment (MdIQR: 3.0 2.0, 5.0 vs 2.0 1.0, 4.0, P < 0.001), Physician Global Assessment (MdIQR: 2.0 2.0, 3.0 vs 2.0 1.0, 3.0, P=0.024), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (MdIQR: 1.0 0.0, 3.0 vs 1.0 0.0, 3.0, P=0.049, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (MdIQR: 2.7 1.5, 4.0 vs 1.9 1.0, 3.1, P<0.001), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (MdIQR: 1.5 0.4, 2.9 vs 1.2 0.2, 2.4, P=0.008) and the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society Health Index (MdIQR: 6.0 3.3, 9.0 vs 5.0 2.0, 8.0, P < 0.001) than those without enthesitis. Logistic regression analysis showed that history of anterior chest pain (OR=1.428, 95% CI: 1.084-1.881, P=0.011) and peripheral arthritis (OR=2.166, 95% CI: 1.521-3.086, P < 0.001) were risk factors for the enthesitis.
      Conclusion  Compared with patients without enthesitis, AS patients combined with enthesitis have a younger age of onset and a greater risk for occurrence of peripheral arthritis. AS patients with enthesitis have more severe disease activity and body disfunction, so clinicians should pay more attention to it.

     

/

返回文章
返回