PD-L1抑制剂治疗小细胞肺癌的有效性和安全性分析

Effectiveness and safety of PD-L1 inhibitors in treatment of small cell lung cancer

  • 摘要:
      背景  以PD-L1抑制剂为主的免疫治疗为小细胞肺癌(small cell lung cancer,SCLC)患者带来了希望,但其在真实世界中应用的数据相对匮乏。
      目的  分析SCLC患者接受PD-L1抑制剂治疗的有效性和安全性,探索疗效相关影响因素。
      方法  回顾性分析解放军总医院第一医学中心2018年1月1日- 2021年6月30日收治的经PD-L1抑制剂治疗的SCLC患者的临床资料,患者均接受过PD-L1抑制剂阿替利珠单抗(1 200 mg静脉滴注,1次/3周)或度伐利尤单抗(1 500 mg静脉滴注,1次/3周)的规范治疗。使用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析不同因素与预后的关系,使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析不同因素对患者生存的影响。
      结果  共有100例患者纳入研究,其中男性87例,女性13例。中位年龄61.0岁。局限期(limited stage,LS) 31例,广泛期(extensive stage,ES) 69例。100例患者中,疗效评价为完全缓解(complete response,CR) 1例,部分缓解(partial response,PR) 69例,疾病稳定(stable disease,SD) 24例,疾病进展(progressive disease,PD) 6例。中位无进展生存时间(progression-free survival,PFS) 5.2个月。多因素Cox回归分析提示ECOG PS 0分(95% CI:0.011 ~ 0.219,P<0.001)、局限期(95% CI:0.223 ~ 0.976,P=0.043)和一线即接受PD-L1抑制剂治疗(95% CI:0.111 ~ 0.652,P=0.004)与患者较长PFS相关。接受免疫联合化疗的患者相比接受免疫单药(95% CI:0.041 ~ 0.892,P=0.035)和免疫联合抗血管治疗(95% CI:0.035 ~ 0.575,P=0.006)的患者PFS更长。安全性方面,一般不良反应发生率≤35%,多为白细胞计数减低、恶心、呕吐和肝功能异常等。免疫相关不良反应发生率<10%,为肺炎、甲状腺功能减低和皮疹等。3级及以上不良反应中,一般不良反应发生率≤13%,免疫相关不良反应发生率≤2%;尚未发生死亡相关不良事件。
      结论  以PD-L1抑制剂为主的免疫治疗对SCLC是一种有前景的治疗方式,其有效性和安全性较高,耐受性较好。推荐尽早一线采用免疫联合化疗方式治疗SCLC。初步分析发现SCLC的多种组合治疗方式中,免疫联合抗血管治疗劣于免疫联合化疗,而免疫+化疗+抗血管治疗不优于免疫联合化疗。

     

    Abstract:
      Background  As a key strategy for immunotherapy, anti-PD-L1 therapy holds promise for the treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but there is a relative paucity of data on its use in the real world.
      Objective  To analyze the efficacy and safety of SCLC patients treated with anti-PD-L1 therapy and explore the factors influencing efficacy.
      Methods  Clinical data about SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitor from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021 in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyze the association between different factors and prognosis. Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in survival curves were evaluated using the log-rank test.
      Results  A total of 100 patients were enrolled, including 87 males and 13 females. The median age was 61.0 years. There were 31 cases in the limited stage (LS) and 69 cases in the extensive stage (ES). All of them received treatment with atelelizumab 1200 mg intravenous infusion (Ⅳ) once every 3 weeks or dulvalizumab 1 500 mg Ⅳ once every 3 weeks. Among the 100 cases, 1 case achieved complete response (CR), 69 cases achieved partial response (PR), 24 cases maintained stable (SD), and 6 cases progressed (PD). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of these 100 patients was 5.2 months. Multifactorial Cox regression analysis suggested that ECOG PS score of 0 (95% CI: 0.011-0.219, P<0.001), limited stage (95% CI: 0.223-0.976, P=0.043) and first-line treatment using PD-L1 inhibitor (95% CI : 0.111-0.652, P =0.004) were associated with longer PFS. PFS was longer in patients receiving anti-PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy compared with those receiving anti-PD-L1 therapy alone (95% CI: 0.041-0.892, P=0.035) and anti-PD-L1 therapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy (95% CI: 0.035-0.575, P=0.006). In terms of safety, the incidence of general adverse reactions was less than or equal to 35%, and most of them were leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and abnormal liver function. The incidence of immune-related adverse reactions was less than 10%, including pneumonia, hypothyroidism and rash. Grade 3/4 general adverse reactions was less than or equal to 13%, grade 3/4 immune-related adverse reactions was less than or equal to 2%, and no death-related adverse events occurred.
      Conclusion  Immunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors is a promising treatment for SCLC, with high efficacy and tolerable safety. It is recommended to use immunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment as early as possible. Preliminary analysis finds that among the multiple treatment options for SCLC, immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy is inferior to immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, whereas immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenic therapy is not superior to immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回