电子对抗作业环境长期暴露对心脏自主神经功能指标的影响

Effects of long-term operating exposed to electronic countermeasures environment on indexes of cardiac autonomic nervous function

  • 摘要:
      背景  既往证据表明电磁辐射对心血管系统具有损伤作用,然而长期暴露于电子对抗(electronic countermeasure,ECM)电磁环境对心脏自主神经系统(cardiac autonomic nerve system,CANS)的影响研究甚少。
      目的  探讨高频电磁环境长期暴露对电子对抗作业人员CANS功能指标的影响。
      方法  2019年4 - 10月招募某电子对抗部队官兵,采用倾向性评分匹配方法均衡混杂因素,入选456例。根据作业环境分为暴露组年龄(32.08±9.44)岁和非暴露组年龄(31.59±9.45)岁,两组各228例,其中男性均为214例,女性均为14例。入选者均行24 h动态心电图和24 h动态血压监测,比较两组心率、心率变异性(heart rate variability,HRV)、昼夜血压等心脏自主神经功能指标。
      结果  电磁环境频段为5.5 MHz ~ 1.84 GHz,介于高频至特高频。暴露组与非暴露组的年龄、性别、体质量指数、吸烟史和饮酒史差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。24 h动态心电图可见暴露组干扰心搏数Md(IQR):18 643.00(8 006.00,53 010.75) vs 8 006.00(8 006.00,21 826.75)和窦性心动过缓阵数Md(IQR):12.50(0.00,209.25) vs 0.00(0.00,9.00)较非暴露组升高(P均<0.001),但最低心率较非暴露组显著降低(43.39±5.15)/min vs (44.68±4.44)/min,P=0.004。HRV指标中,反映迷走神经活性的全程相邻心搏间期差值均方根值(52.64±23.95 vs 48.28±18.58)和反映交感神经活性的极低频功率Md(IQR):4 650.92(3 094.00,5 519.50) ms2 vs 4 650.92(3 235.50,4 650.92) ms2与非暴露组比较均显著升高(P<0.05)。此外,暴露组全天收缩压平均值(117.46±6.70) mmHg vs (118.73±6.61) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、全天舒张压平均值(69.25±5.62) mmHg vs (70.76±5.68) mmHg、白天舒张压平均值(71.22±5.72) mmHg vs (72.70±5.69) mmHg,夜间舒张压平均值(62.22±6.98) mmHg vs (63.54±6.06) mmHg和夜间舒张压下降率较非暴露组均显著下降(P均<0.05),且暴露组反杓型血压11(4.82%) vs 2(0.88%)比例较非暴露组升高(P<0.05)。
      结论  长期暴露于高频电磁环境的电子对抗环境作业人员虽然交感神经与迷走神经张力同时增高,但24 h心率和血压均显著降低,表明心脏迷走神经占优势,且伴随窦性心动过缓发生率明显增加,心律失常发生风险升高。此外,反杓型血压比例升高,增加心血管疾病发生风险。

     

    Abstract:
      Background   Previous evidences indicate that electromagnetic radiation may damage the cardiovascular system. However, there are few studies on the effects of long-term exposure to electronic countermeasures (ECM) electromagnetic environment on cardiac autonomic nerve system (CANS).
      Objective   To investigate the effects of long-term exposure to high frequency electromagnetic environment on indicators of CANS of electronic countermeasure operators.
      Methods  From April to October in 2019, officers and soldiers of an electronic countermeasures force were recruited, and 456 cases were assessed with propensity score matching method to balance confounding factors. The subjects were divided into the exposed group (age: 32.08±9.44 years) and the non-exposed group (age: 31.59±9.45 years) according to the operating environment, with 228 cases in each group, including 214 males and 14 females. The 24 h ambulatory electrocardiogram and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure were monitored in all subjects to compare the differences in heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), and circadian blood pressure between the two groups.
      Results  The electromagnetic environment frequency band was 5.5MHz to 1.84GHz, ranging from high frequency to ultra-high frequency. No significant difference was found in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking history and drinking history between the exposed group and the non-exposed group. The 24 h dynamic electrocardiogram showed that the number of disturbed heart beats (MdIQR: 18 643.00 8 006.00, 53 010.75 vs 8 006.00 8 006.00, 21 826.75) and sinus bradycardia (MdIQR: 12.5 0.00, 209.25 vs 0.00 0.00, 9.00) in the exposed group were higher than those in the non-exposed group (P < 0.001, respectively). However, the minimum heart rate was significantly lower than that of the non-exposed group (43.39±5.15/min vs 44.68±4.44/min, P=0.004). HRV indexes indicated that the square root of the mean squared difference of successive normal RR intervals (RMSSD) (52.64±23.95 vs 48.28±18.58) reflecting vagal nerve activity and VLF (4 650.923 094.00, 5 519.50 ms2 vs 4 650.923 235.50, 4 650.92 ms2) reflecting sympathetic nerve activity improved obviously in comparison to those in the non-exposed group (P < 0.05, respectively). In addition, 24 h mean systolic blood pressure (BP) (117.46±6.70 mmHg vs 118.73±6.61 mmHg), 24 h mean diastolic BP (69.25±5.62 mmHg vs 70.76±5.68 mmHg), daytime mean diastolic BP (71.22±5.72 mmHg vs 72.70±5.69 mmHg) and night mean diastolic BP (62.22±6.98 mmHg vs 63.54±6.06 mmHg) in the exposed group were lower than those in the non-exposed group (all P < 0.05). The proportion of reverse-dippers diastolic BP at night in the exposed group (114.82% vs 20.88%) showed an increasing trend in comparison to the non-exposed group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion   The sympathetic and vagal nerve tone increase simultaneously in the electronic countermeasure operators exposed to high frequency electromagnetic radiation for a long time. Both 24 h heart rate and blood pressure decrease significantly accompanied by sinus bradycardia increasing in the exposed group, suggesting a preponderance of the vagus nerve and an increasing risk of arrhythmia.

     

/

返回文章
返回