心脏瓣膜置换术中不同心肌灌注方法的研究

Study on different myocardial protection methods in cardiac valve replacement

  • 摘要: 目的:对体外循环(ECC)下瓣膜置换术中不同的心肌灌注方法进行比较,探讨各方法对心肌的保护效果及对围术期的影响。方法:53例瓣膜手术按所采用的心肌灌注方法分为晶体停搏液组(组Ⅰ),含血停搏液组(组Ⅱ)和温血逆灌不停跳组(组Ⅲ)。术前各组患者的一般临床资料均衡,但Ⅳ级心功者组Ⅱ(10%)、组Ⅲ(15.4%)多于组Ⅰ(0.0%)。结果:术中ECC时间、术后呼吸机使用时间、多巴胺支持率、引流量等各组之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。组Ⅰ最低咽温、心脏自动复苏率、左室射血分数(LVEF)明显低于组Ⅱ和组Ⅲ(P<0.05);ECC总液量、稀释度、晶体停搏液灌注量、血K+浓度均高于组Ⅱ和组Ⅲ(P<0.05)。组Ⅲ主动脉阻断时间、ECC总液量低于组Ⅰ和组Ⅱ(P<0.05);流量和最低咽温高于组Ⅰ和组Ⅱ(P<0.05)。与术前比,术后LVEF在组Ⅱ和组Ⅲ仅有轻微下降(P>0.05),而组Ⅰ显著降低(P<0.05)。结论:含血灌注和不停跳温血灌注能给心肌提供能量,因而较晶体停搏液具有更明显的心肌保护效果,且对围术早期的水、电解质影响较小。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluated the effective of myocardial protection of three perfusion methods in cardiac valve replacement under Extracorporeal Circulation (ECC) Methods: 53 patients were divided into three groups. Group1 received cold crystalloid cardioplegia induction, group 2 were perfused with 4:1 blood cardioplegia, group 3 received continuous warm blood retrograde perfusion. Results: The total volume and hemodilution of group 2 and group 3 were lower than group 1, but the temperature was higher than group 1, there were significantly difference (P<0.05) The perfusion volume of crystalloid cardioplegia and blood k+ of group 1 were higher than group 2 (P<0.05) The rate of auto-resuscitation was lower than group 2 (P<0.05) The ECC total volume and aortic clam time in group3 were lower than that in group2 and group1 (P<0.05) The post operative LVEF decreased slightly in group2 and group3 (P>0.05), but decreased significantly in group1 (P<0.05) Conclusion: crystalloid cardioplegia was convenient to use for myocardial protection, but it was not satisfied for sickly patients with dysfunction of left ventricle 4:1 cold blood cardioplegia and normal thermia ECC with retrograde perfusion without cardiac arrest can provide the energy for myocardial, therefore, it was benefit for valve replacement

     

/

返回文章
返回