食管乳头状瘤内镜下治疗对比研究

Comparison of endoscopic treatment effects on esophageal papilloma

  • 摘要: 目的 内镜下治疗食管乳头状瘤疗效比较。方法 对我院45例患者进行微波与氩气刀治疗,术后3~6个月复查胃镜,并记录临床症状,比较两者之间优越性。结果 复查内镜两组改善情况:15例经微波治疗后有效率86.7%;30例经氩气刀治疗后有效率93.3%(χ2=0.03,P>0.05)。临床症状改善情况:15例经微波治疗后有效率86.7%;30例经氩气刀治疗后有效率96.7%(χ2=0.40,P>0.05)。结论 内镜下微波与氩气刀治疗食管乳头状瘤疗效相当,无统计学差异。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of endoscopic treatment on esophageal papilloma. Methods Forty-five patients with esophageal papilloma were treated in our hospital with microwave(MV)and argon-beam coagulator(ABC).After 3-6 months,the patients underwent gastroscopy,and their clinical manifestations were recorded and advantages of the two treatment modalities were compared. Results The curative rate of microwave treatment for 15 patients and argon-beam coagulator treatment for 30 patients was 86.70%and 93.30%,respectively(χ2=0.03,P>0.05).The improvement rate of clinical manifestations was 86.70%:in 15 patients after microwave treatment and 96.70%in 30 patients after argon-beam coagulator treatment(χ2=0.40,P>0.05),respectively. Conclusion The curative effect of treatment with endoscopic microwave and argon-beam coagulator on esophageal papilloma is almost similar.

     

/

返回文章
返回