血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂治疗门静脉高压临床试验的Meta分析

Treatment of portal hypertension with angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonists:A meta-analysis of controlled trials

  • 摘要: 目的 评价血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ARB)用于门静脉高压患者治疗的有效性和安全性。方法 采用循证医学系统评价方法,电子检索Cochran图书馆临床对照试验资料库、PubMed、EBSCO、Springer、Ovid、外文生物医学期刊全文数据库和CBMdisc、CNKI,文献检索起止时间均从建库至2010年7月,同时检索纳入文献的参考文献,纳入探讨血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂用于门静脉高压患者治疗的临床有效性和安全性的随机对照试验,并逐个进行质量评价和资料提取。结果 共检出34篇文献,最终纳入6篇,涉及RCT 6项,纳入患者246例。Meta分析提示:在降低肝硬化门脉高压患者的HVPG值方面,ARB类药物较对照组稍强,但差异无统计学意义WMD=-1.62,95%CI(-5.26,2.01),P=0.38。且不良事件发生率高于空白对照或普萘洛尔RR=3.78,95%CI(1.31,10.96),P=0.01。结论 ARB类药物用于门静脉高压患者的治疗作用有限,且不良反应明显升高;但本研究纳入的文献较少,有待更多高质量的多中心、大样本随机对照临床试验证实结论。

     

    Abstract: Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonists(ARB) in treatment of portal hypertension.Methods Controlled trials were retrieved from the Cochrane Library(Issue 3,2010),PubMed,EBSCO,Springer,Ovid,Foreign Journals Integration System,CBMdisc and CNKI(from establishment to July 2010).References in retrieved articles were also retrieved.Randomized controlled trials(RCT) in which the effectiveness and safety of ARB used in treatment of portal hypertension were included in this study.The academic level of each retrieved trial was assessed by meta-analysis with the Rev Man 5 software.Results Of the 34 papers retrieved,6 involving 246 patients and 6 parameters of RCT were finally included.Meta-analysis showed that the effect of ARB on hepatic venous pressure gradient(HVPG) was stronger in patients with portal hypertension than in controls(WMD=-1.62,95% CI=-5.26 and 2.01,P=0.38).However,the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in patients with portal hypertension than in controls(RR=3.78,95% CI=1.31 and 10.96,P=0.01).Conclusion ARB can be used in treatment of portal hypertension with a limited effect and a high incidence of adverse events.More controlled studies with a large sample size are needed.

     

/

返回文章
返回