高屈曲与旋转平台假体术后膝关节屈曲度的比较研究

Comparison of the flexion with high flexion and rotating platform prothesis in total knee arthroplasty

  • 摘要: 目的: 对比PFC-RPF高屈曲度假体与传统PFC-RP旋转平台假体全膝关节置换术(TKA)后近期关节屈曲度的差异。方法: 232例(346膝)行PFC-RPF和PFC-RP假体置换术的膝骨关节炎患者,随机分为10组,包括采用PFC-RPF的AⅠf/BⅠf/AⅡf/CⅡf/DⅡf组和采用PFC-RP的AⅠ/BⅠ/AⅡ/CⅡ/DⅡ组。摄取过屈及过伸位X片,分别测量胫股角,进行比较。结果: 行单膝置换的AⅠf/AⅠ和BⅠf/BⅠ组间有显著性差异(P<0.05);双膝同时置换的AⅡf/AⅡ,CⅡf/CⅡ和DⅡf/DⅡ组间无显著性差异。结论: TKA术后2年内,单膝置换采用PFC-RPF者屈曲度优于PFC-RP,双膝同时置换时屈曲度差别不明显。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To compare the maximum flexion of knee joint after total knee arthroplasty(TKA) using high flexion prosthesis(PFC-RPF) and traditional rotating platform prothesis(PFC-RP). Methods: A total of 232 patients(346 knees) with osteoarthritis underwent TKA using PFC-RPF or PFC-RP prosthesis.Patients were randomized to 10 groups.Groups AⅠf/BⅠf /AⅡf /CⅡf/DⅡf underwent TKA using PFC-RPF,while groups AⅠ/BⅠ/AⅡ/CⅡ/DⅡunderwent TKA using PFC-RP.The hyperextension and hyperinflexion of lateral knee joint were observed on radiograph and compared with the ibiofemoral angle. Results: A significant difference was observed in the maximum flexion of knee joint between groups AⅠf /AⅠand BⅠf /BⅠ.However,no significant difference was found in the maximum flexion of knee joint between groups AⅡf /AⅡ,CⅡf /CⅡand DⅡf /DⅡ. Conclusion: The flexion of knee joint is better after unilateral knee replacement using PFC-RPF than with PFC-RP.However,the flexion of knee joint is not improved after bilateral knee replacement.

     

/

返回文章
返回