张乐天, 曹必样, 吴陈陈, 李娜, 王竞. 早发型胰腺癌临床病理特征、治疗策略和预后研究[J]. 解放军医学院学报. DOI: 10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.021
引用本文: 张乐天, 曹必样, 吴陈陈, 李娜, 王竞. 早发型胰腺癌临床病理特征、治疗策略和预后研究[J]. 解放军医学院学报. DOI: 10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.021
ZHANG Letian, CAO Biyang, WU Chenchen, LI Na, WANG Jing. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment strategies and prognosis in patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL. DOI: 10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.021
Citation: ZHANG Letian, CAO Biyang, WU Chenchen, LI Na, WANG Jing. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment strategies and prognosis in patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL. DOI: 10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.021

早发型胰腺癌临床病理特征、治疗策略和预后研究

Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment strategies and prognosis in patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer

  • 摘要:
    背景 近年来早发型胰腺癌(≤50岁)发病率逐年上升,但对这一人群临床病理特征、治疗策略与预后的关系研究较少。
    目的 分析早发型胰腺癌患者的临床病理特征及其治疗策略与预后的关系。
    方法 回顾2017年1月至2020年12月解放军总医院第一医学中心诊治的18 ~ 50岁胰腺癌患者临床病理资料和治疗方案,分析其与生存的关系。
    结果 共纳入272例早发型胰腺癌患者,中位年龄46(23 ~ 50)岁,男性、胰头部肿瘤、低分化腺癌分别占70.6%、55.9%和50.3%,Ⅰ ~ Ⅳ期患者分别占22.8%、28.3%、18%和30.9%。接受手术切除、化疗、放疗、免疫治疗和靶向治疗的患者分别占57.0%、86.8%、27.9%、38.6%和31.6%。全组中位总生存(OS)为26.5 (95% CI:24.2 ~ 30.8)个月,1、2、5年生存率分别是78.0%,57.1%和24.3%。局限期单纯手术组和辅助治疗组中位OS分别为30.7个月和36.4个月(P=0.885);局部晚期放疗为主综合治疗组、手术切除组和单纯化疗组中位OS分别为29.9个月、16.9个月和15.7个月(P=0.207);转移性患者全部接受了化疗,单纯化疗组、放疗组和手术切除组中位OS分别为8.3个月、18.8个月和22.5个月(P=0.109);术后复发放疗为主综合治疗组和单纯化疗组复发后中位OS分别为15.9个月和15.4个月(P=0.415),中位无进展生存分别为10.5个月和6.3个月(P=0.204)。多因素Cox回归分析表明CA19-9 (>1 000 U·mL-1 vs ≤1 000 U·mL-1HR=1.80,95% CI:1.16 ~ 2.81)、病理分级(中-高分化vs 低分化;HR=0.66,95% CI:0.41 ~ 0.95)、临床分期(IV期vs I期;HR=2.36,95% CI:1.12 ~ 4.99)、根治性手术(有vs 无;HR=0.39,95% CI:0.22 ~ 0.69)和化疗周期数(>6周期vs ≤6周期;HR=0.44,95% CI:0.29 ~ 0.67)是独立预后因素。
    结论 早发型胰腺癌以男性患者为主,分期较早,分化较差,局限期患者单纯手术与术后辅助化疗生存相似,局部晚期和转移性患者接受放疗为主综合治疗有改善生存趋势,术后复发患者采用放疗可取得较好无进展生存。

     

    Abstract:
    Background In recent years, the rising incidence of early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) in patients younger than 50 years has attracted increasing attention. However, there are few studies on the clinicopathological features and treatment strategies of EOPC.
    Objective To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment strategies, and prognostic factors in patients with EOPC.
    Methods The clinical and treatment data of patients with EOPC from the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected. The relationships between clinical features, treatment strategies and survival outcomes were analyzed.
    Results A total of 272 patients with EOPC were included in this study. The median age of the overall cohort was 46 years (range, 23-50 years). Among them, male patients, patients with pancreatic head disease, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma accounted for 70.6%, 55.9%, and 50.3%, respectively. There were 22.8%, 28.3%, 18.0%, and 30.9% of patients in stage I, II, III, IV, respectively. There were 57%, 86.8%, 27.9%, 38.6%, and 31.6% of patients who underwent primary tumor surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, respectively. The median overall survival (mOS) was 26.5 months (95% CI: 24.2-30.8); the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year OS were 78.0%, 57.1%, and 24.3%, respectively. In patients with limited disease, the mOS of surgery alone group and adjuvant therapy group was 30.7 and 36.4 months, respectively (P=0.885). In patients with locally advanced disease, the mOS of RT-based comprehensive treatment (RT-based CMT) group, resection group, and chemotherapy alone group was 29.9, 16.9, and 15.7 months, respectively (P=0.207). All patients with metastatic disease received chemotherapy; the mOS of chemotherapy alone, RT, and resection groups was 8.3, 18.8, and 22.5 months, respectively (P=0.109). In patients with postoperative recurrence, the mOS of chemotherapy alone group and RT-based CMT group was 15.9 and 15.4 months (P=0.415), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 and 6.3 months (P=0.204), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pathological differentiation (high and moderately vs. poorly; HR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.41-0.95), baseline CA19-9 level (>1 000 U·mL-1 vs ≤1 000 U·mL-1; HR=1.80, 95% CI: 1.16-2.81), clinical stage (IV vs I; HR=2.36, 95% CI: 1.12-4.99), surgery (yes vs no; HR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.69), and the number of chemotherapy cycles (>6 vs ≤6; HR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.67) were independent prognostic factors.
    Conclusion Patients with EOPC exhibit a male predilection, earlier stage, and poor differentiation. There was no significant survival differences between surgery alone and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with localized disease. RT-based CMT showed a trend towards improved survival in patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease, and RT is associated with better PFS in patients with postoperative recurrence.

     

/

返回文章
返回