王宇彤, 王曦曦, 刘传玲, 孔子清, 刘立群, 黄德钦, 赵卫红. PARP抑制剂联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期恶性肿瘤的临床实际资料研究[J]. 解放军医学院学报. DOI: 10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.087
引用本文: 王宇彤, 王曦曦, 刘传玲, 孔子清, 刘立群, 黄德钦, 赵卫红. PARP抑制剂联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期恶性肿瘤的临床实际资料研究[J]. 解放军医学院学报. DOI: 10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.087
WANG Yutong, WANG Xixi, LIU Chuanling, KONG Ziqing, LIU Liqun, HUANG Deqin, ZHAO Weihong. Actual clinical data of PARP inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of advanced malignant tumors[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL. DOI: 10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.087
Citation: WANG Yutong, WANG Xixi, LIU Chuanling, KONG Ziqing, LIU Liqun, HUANG Deqin, ZHAO Weihong. Actual clinical data of PARP inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of advanced malignant tumors[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL. DOI: 10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.087

PARP抑制剂联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期恶性肿瘤的临床实际资料研究

Actual clinical data of PARP inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of advanced malignant tumors

  • 摘要:
    背景 免疫治疗在多种恶性恶性肿瘤中取得突破性进展,但是单药应用效果欠佳;针对BRCA致病/疑似致病突变等具有DNA错配修复缺陷者,聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶抑制剂(Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor,PARPi)可以上调其PD-L1的表达,理论上两者联合治疗具有协同作用,但临床上相关研究较少。
    目的 探讨临床实际中PARP抑制剂联合免疫治疗在晚期恶性肿瘤中的疗效、安全性,并探索预后相关生物标志物。
    方法 收集2014年1月至2022年12月在解放军总医学第一医学中心接受PARP抑制剂联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期恶性肿瘤患者的临床资料,分析其疗效和安全性。疗效指标包括客观缓解率(Objective response rate,ORR)、疾病控制率(Disease control rate,DCR)、无进展生存期(Progression free survival,PFS)、总生存期(Overall survival,OS)。Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,使用单因素、多因素COX回归分析不同因素与预后的关系。
    结果 本研究共纳入136例晚期恶性肿瘤患者,其中男性83例(61.0%),女性53例(39.0%),非小细胞肺癌29例(21.3%),小细胞肺癌26例(19.1%),卵巢癌21例(15.4%),胰腺癌9例(6.6%),胆管癌6例(4.4%),尿路上皮癌6例(4.4%),其他瘤种39例(28.7%);后线治疗(三线及以上)66例(48.5%)。136例中21例达PR(15.4%),73例SD(53.7%),42例PD(30.9%)。总体ORR为15.4%,DCR为69.1%。截至末次随访时间2023年10月1日,中位随访时间为31.0个月。中位PFS为3.65个月(95% CI:3.0 ~ 4.5),中位OS为10.0个月(95% CI:9.0 ~ 12.0)。多因素COX结果显示:前线治疗(HR:1.466,95% CI:1.032 ~ 2.102,P=0.037)、去化疗(HR:0.593,95% CI:0.404 ~ 0.871,P=0.008)、最佳疗效达DCR(HR:7.414,95% CI:4.496 ~ 12.227,P<0.001)与PFS呈正相关;体力状态好(HR:2.182,95% CI:1.411 ~ 3.375,P<0.001)、疗效达DCR(HR:4.659,95% CI:2.909 ~ 7.463,P<0.001)、NLR<4(HR:2.343,95% CI:1.256 ~ 4.367,P =0.007)与OS正相关。85例(62.5%)患者发生治疗相关不良事件,其中73例(53.7%)为1 ~ 2级,主要为恶心、呕吐、贫血、免疫相关性肺炎等,无治疗相关死亡,总体安全性良好可控。
    结论 PARP抑制剂与免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗晚期恶性肿瘤疗效好,安全可控,可作为晚期肿瘤患者后线治疗方案的选择,值得进一步扩大样本研究并进行有效的生物标记物探索。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Immunotherapy has made breakthroughs in a variety of malignant tumors, but the effect of monotherapy is not good; PARP inhibitors can up-regulate the expression of PD-L1 in patients with DNA mismatch repair defects such as BRCA pathogenic/suspected pathogenic mutations, and the combination therapy of the two has a synergistic effect. However, there are fewer relevant clinical studies.
    Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in combination with immunotherapy for advanced malignancies in clinical practice, and to conduct a preliminary exploration of biomarkers.
    Methods Clinical data about patients with advanced malignant tumors treated with PARP inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors from January 2014 to December 2022 at the First Medical Center Chinese PLA General Hospital were collected, and their efficacy and safety were analyzed. The efficacy indexes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier method for plotting survival curves, and the relationship between different factors and prognosis was analyzed using unifactorial and multifactorial COX regression.
    Results A total of 136 patients with advanced malignant tumors were included in this study, including 83 (61.0%) males and 53 (39.0%) females, 29 (21.3%) cases of non-small-cell lung cancer, 26 (19.1%) cases of small-cell lung cancer, 21 (15.4%) cases of ovarian cancer, 21 (15.4%) cases of 9 cases (6.6%) of pancreatic cancer, 6 cases (4.4%) of cholangiocarcinoma, 6 cases (4.4%) of uroepithelial carcinoma, and 39 cases (28.7%) of other tumors; 66 patients (48.5%) with the number of lines of treatment of three lines or more; no patient reached CR,21 cases (15.4%) of PR, 73 cases (53.7%) of SD, and 42 cases (30.9%) of PD. The overall ORR was 15.4% and the DCR was 69.1%. As of the final follow-up time of October 1, 2023, the median follow-up time was 31.0 months. The median PFS was 3.65 months (95% CI: 3.0-4.5) and the median OS was 10.0 months (95% CI: 9.0-12.0). Multivariate COX regression analyses showed that front-line treatment (HR: 1.466, 95% CI: 1.032-2.102, P=0.037), de-chemotherapy (HR: 0.593, 95% CI: 0.404-0.871, P=0.008) and efficacy up to DCR (HR:7.414, 95% CI: 4.496-12.227, P<0.001) were positively correlated with PFS; and good physical status (HR: 2.182, 95% CI: 1.411-3.375, P<0.001), efficacy to DCR (HR: 4.659, 95% CI: 2.909-7.463, P<0.001) and NLR < 4 (HR: 2.343, 95% CI: 1.256-4.367, P =0.007) were positively correlated with OS. A total of 85 (62.5%) patients in this study experienced treatment-related adverse events, of which 73 (53.7%) were in grade 1-2, mainly presented as nausea, vomiting, anemia, and immune-associated pneumonia, and there were no treatment-related deaths, resulting in a good and controllable overall safety profile.
    Conclusion The combination of PARP inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced malignancies has considerable efficacy, safety and controllability, and provides patients with advanced tumors with a choice of late-line treatment options, which is worthy of further expansion of sample studies and effective biomarker exploration.

     

/

返回文章
返回