赵红艳, 徐先荣, 张琼, 许永华, 曹金军, 张玲, 是文辉. 直升机飞行人员低压舱耳气压功能分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2014, 35(4): 304-307. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2014.04.002
引用本文: 赵红艳, 徐先荣, 张琼, 许永华, 曹金军, 张玲, 是文辉. 直升机飞行人员低压舱耳气压功能分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2014, 35(4): 304-307. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2014.04.002
ZHAO Hong-yan, XU Xian-rong, ZHANG Qiong, XU Yong-hua, CAO Jin-jun, ZHANG Ling, SHI Wen-hui. Aural air-pressure function of helicopter aircrews in hypobaric chamber[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2014, 35(4): 304-307. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2014.04.002
Citation: ZHAO Hong-yan, XU Xian-rong, ZHANG Qiong, XU Yong-hua, CAO Jin-jun, ZHANG Ling, SHI Wen-hui. Aural air-pressure function of helicopter aircrews in hypobaric chamber[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2014, 35(4): 304-307. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2014.04.002

直升机飞行人员低压舱耳气压功能分析

Aural air-pressure function of helicopter aircrews in hypobaric chamber

  • 摘要: 目的 了解直升机飞行人员耳气压功能的整体状况。 方法 2013年8月对某部158名直升机飞行人员进行病史询问,并行电耳镜、纯音测听、声导抗及前鼻镜、鼻内镜检查。无低压舱检查禁忌证者进入舱内,以15 m/s的速度“上升”至4 000 m,停留5 min后以5 m/s的速度“下降”至地面,每“上升”和“下降”1 000 m时飞行人员在症状列表中选勾一次主观感觉。出舱后复查电耳镜、纯音测听和声导抗,与进舱前的检查结果进行对照。 结果 共完成检查157人(314耳),75例(左耳23例、右耳27例、双耳25例)在不同高度分别出现耳闷胀、耳压痛等症状,在3 000~1 000 m下降时症状加重;出舱后电耳镜检查鼓膜Ⅱ度充血19例30耳(左耳2例、右耳6例、双耳11例),Ⅲ度充血1例1耳(右耳);出舱后纯音测听听力异常20例31耳(左耳3例、右耳6例、双耳11例),呈轻到中度传导性聋;出舱后声导抗测试C型曲线19例22耳(左耳8例、右耳8例、双耳3例),B型曲线3例3耳(左耳1例、右耳2例)。157例314耳中,达耳气压功能不良诊断标准者10例17耳(左耳2例、右耳1例、双耳7例),分别占6.37%(10/157)和5.41%(17/314),其中轻度不良的6例12耳,中度不良的1例1耳(左耳),重度不良的3例4耳(左耳、右耳、双耳各1例)。 结论 直升机飞行人员耳气压功能的整体状况良好,但仍有极少数飞行人员没有很好掌握主动开放咽鼓管的动作要领,需加强训练。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the aural air-pressure function in helicopter aircrews. Methods Medical history of 158 helicopter aircrews was recorded. The helicopter aircrews underwent electric auriscopy, pure-tone test, tympanometry, rhinoscopy and nasal endoscopy in August 2013. Those without contraindications for hypobaric chamber test were allowed to enter the chamber which was elevated to 4 000 m at the velocity of 15 m/s for 5 min and then descended to the ground at the velocity of 5 m/s. The aircrews recorded their subjective symptoms when the chamber was elevated to 1 000 m and descended to 1 000 m at each time. The findings of electric auriscopy, pure-tone test and tympanometry after they came out of the chamber were compared with those before they went into the chamber. Results Of the 157 aircrews (314 ears) who underwent hypobaric chamber test, 75 (75 ears) presented with symptoms such as aural fullness and tenderness which exaggerated when the chamber was descended to 3 000-1 000 m, 19 (30 ears) presented with degree Ⅱ tympanic membrane hyperemia and 1 (1 ear) presented with degree Ⅲ tympanic membrane hyperemia, 20 (31 ears) presented with mild or moderate conductive hearing loss, 19 (22 ears) showed a C-type curve and 3 (3 ears) showed a B-type curve, 10 (17 ears) were diagnosed with abnormal aural air-pressure function, accounting for 6.37% and 5.41% respectively. Of these 10 aircrews, 6 (12 ears) were diagnosed with mild abnormal aural air-pressure function, 1 (1 ear) with moderate abnormal aural air-pressure function, 3 (4 ears) with severe abnormal aural air-pressure function. Conclusion The general aural airpressure function is good in helicopter aircrews. However, a very small number of helicopter aircrews have not mastered the key points to open their auditory tube and should thus be effectively strained.

     

/

返回文章
返回