韩雅琳, 陈丽, 吴志勇, 秦锐, 王治宽, 石燕, 戴广海. 伊立替康联合奥沙利铂三线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2014, 35(5): 416-419,432. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2014.05.005
引用本文: 韩雅琳, 陈丽, 吴志勇, 秦锐, 王治宽, 石燕, 戴广海. 伊立替康联合奥沙利铂三线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2014, 35(5): 416-419,432. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2014.05.005
HAN Ya-lin, CHEN Li, WU Zhi-yong, QIN Rui, WANG Zhi-kuan, SHI Yan, DAI Guang-hai. Efficiency of combined irinotecan and oxaliplation third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2014, 35(5): 416-419,432. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2014.05.005
Citation: HAN Ya-lin, CHEN Li, WU Zhi-yong, QIN Rui, WANG Zhi-kuan, SHI Yan, DAI Guang-hai. Efficiency of combined irinotecan and oxaliplation third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2014, 35(5): 416-419,432. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2014.05.005

伊立替康联合奥沙利铂三线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析

Efficiency of combined irinotecan and oxaliplation third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients

  • 摘要: 目的 观察伊立替康(CPT-11)联合奥沙利铂(LOHP)三线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及不良反应。 方法 回顾性分析2007年7月-2012年7月在我院接受伊立替康联合奥沙利铂三线治疗的31例晚期胃癌患者的临床资料。按伊立替康180 mg/m2静脉滴注2 h,奥沙利铂85 mg/m2静脉滴注2 h,21天为1个周期。每1周期后根据美国国家癌症研究所不良事件常用术语评定标准(CTCAE)3.0版进行不良反应分级,每2周期后按实体瘤客观疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1版评价疗效,统计临床有效率、不良反应发生率,并采用Kaplan-Meier进行生存分析。 结果 31例中完全缓解(CR)1例(3.2%),部分缓解(PR)6例(19.4%),稳定(SD)19例(61.3%),进展(PD)5例(16.1%),有效率(CR+PR)22.6%,疾病控制率(CR+PR+SD)83.9%。无进展生存期(PFS)5.0个月(95% CI:3.2~6.8),中位总生存时间(OS)7.8个月(95% CI:6.7~8.9)。严重不良反应包括粒细胞减少3级以上5例(16.1%),白细胞减少3级以上6例(19.4%),血小板减少3级以上3例(9.7%),贫血3级以上2例(6.5%),腹泻3级以上2例(6.5%)。无治疗相关性死亡。 结论 伊立替康联合奥沙利铂三线治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效确切,不良反应可耐受。

     

    Abstract: Objective To observe the effciency of combined irinotecan (CPT-11) and oxaliplation (LOHP) third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients and its adverse reactions. Methods Clinical data about 31 advanced gastric cancer patients who received combined CPT-11 and LOHP third-line chemotherapy in our hospital from July 2007 to July 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were treated with intravenous CPT-11 (180 mg/m2) and LOHP (85 mg/m2), respectively, with 21 days as a cycle. Their adverse reactions were assessed after each cycle according to the NCI-CTCAE (version 3.0) and the efficiency of the combined therapy was assessed after 2 cycles according to the RECIST (version 1.1). The effective rate of the combined therapy and the incidence of adverse reactions were calculated. The survival rate of patients was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier product limit method. Results Of 31 patients, 1 (3.2%) was completely remitted, 6 (19.4%) were partially remitted, 19 (61.3%) became stable, and 5 (16.1%) had progression with an overall response rate (CR+PR) of 22.6% and a disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 83.9%. The progression-free survival (PFS) time was 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.2-6.8) and the median overall survival (OS) time was 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.7-8.9). Severe adverse reactions included neutropenia in 5 patients (16.1%), leucopenia in 6 patients (19.4%), thrombocytopenia in 3 patients (9.7%), anaemia in 2 patients (6.5%) and diarrhea in 2 patients (6.5%). No chemotherapy-related death occurred. Conclusion The short-term efficiency of combined CPT-11 and LOHP third-line chemotherapy is good and its adverse reactions are tolerable in advanced gastric cancer patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回