付越, 王潇潇, 艾洁, 彭丽华, 杨云生. 高分辨率食管测压检测坐位和卧位对14例健康国人食管动力的影响[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2015, 36(3): 216-219. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.03.005
引用本文: 付越, 王潇潇, 艾洁, 彭丽华, 杨云生. 高分辨率食管测压检测坐位和卧位对14例健康国人食管动力的影响[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2015, 36(3): 216-219. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.03.005
FU Yue, WANG Xiaoxiao, AI Jie, PENG Lihua, YANG Yunsheng. Effect of sitting vs. supine posture on high resolution manometry in 14 healthy volunteers[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2015, 36(3): 216-219. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.03.005
Citation: FU Yue, WANG Xiaoxiao, AI Jie, PENG Lihua, YANG Yunsheng. Effect of sitting vs. supine posture on high resolution manometry in 14 healthy volunteers[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2015, 36(3): 216-219. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.03.005

高分辨率食管测压检测坐位和卧位对14例健康国人食管动力的影响

Effect of sitting vs. supine posture on high resolution manometry in 14 healthy volunteers

  • 摘要: 目的 利用高分辨率食管测压技术,探讨体位对食管动力参数的影响。 方法 应用高分辨率食管测压(high resolution manometry,HRM)技术对14名健康成年人坐位和卧位下的食管动力参数进行检测,记录两种体位下的上食管括约肌(upper esophageal sphincter,UES)残余压、咽部压力峰值、骨骼肌压力峰值、近端收缩积分(proximal contraction integral,PCI)、远端收缩积分(distal contraction integral,DCI)、收缩前沿速度(systolic forward velocity,CFV)、食团内部压力(bolus internal pressure,IBP)、下食管括约肌综合松弛压(integrated relaxation pressure, IRP)等参数,并对收缩波完整性进行判断。 结果 14例健康人咽部压力峰值卧位明显低于坐位(P< 0.05),UES残余压、骨骼肌压力峰值、DCI、IBP、IRP卧位均明显高于坐位(P< 0.05),坐、卧位PCI、CFV及收缩波完整性差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。 结论 在进行食管测压时应考虑体位对检测结果的影响。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of sitting and supine positions on esophageal motility detected by high resolution manometry (HRM) technology. Methods The esophageal motility parameters of sitting and supine positions were monitored from fourteen healthy volunteers by HRM. The UES residual pressure, pharyngeal maximum pressure, skeletal muscle maximum pressure, proximal contraction integral (PCI), distal contraction integral (DCI), systolic forward velocity (CFV), bolus internal pressure (IBP), LES residual pressure, and the integrity of the contraction in both positions were recorded. SPSS17.0 was used to compare the data that were collected by HRM-system. Results The pharynx maximum pressure of supine position was significantly lower than that of sitting position (P< 0.05). UES residual pressure, skeletal muscle maximum pressure, distal contraction integral (DCI), internal bolus pressure (IBP), LES residual pressure of supine position were significantly higher than that of sitting position (P< 0.05). There was no significant difference between supine and sitting position in proximal contraction integral (PCI) and systolic forward velocity (CFV) (P> 0.05). Conclusion Different positions apparently affect esophageal motility under physiological conditions. The impact of position on the monitoring results should be taken into account when monitoring HRM esophageal motility.

     

/

返回文章
返回