荣加, 崔立红. 综合护理干预在肠易激综合征治疗中效果分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2015, 36(10): 1000-1002,1055. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.010
引用本文: 荣加, 崔立红. 综合护理干预在肠易激综合征治疗中效果分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2015, 36(10): 1000-1002,1055. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.010
RONG Jia, CUI Lihong. Curative effect analysis of comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2015, 36(10): 1000-1002,1055. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.010
Citation: RONG Jia, CUI Lihong. Curative effect analysis of comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2015, 36(10): 1000-1002,1055. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.010

综合护理干预在肠易激综合征治疗中效果分析

Curative effect analysis of comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with irritable bowel syndrome

  • 摘要: 目的 分析综合护理干预在治疗肠易激综合征中的临床效果。 方法 选择2012年4月- 2014年12月在我院住院的120例肠易激综合征患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组各60例,在给予药物治疗同时,分别实施综合护理干预和常规护理。治疗前及治疗8周后所有患者分别完善肠易激综合征知识问卷、焦虑、抑郁自评量表,并分别采集患者临床症状资料,观察疗效。 结果 观察组治疗效果明显优于对照组(86.67% vs 61.67%,P< 0.05),治疗后观察组焦虑、抑郁评分较对照组显著降低(42.54±6.04 vs 52.92±6.09,45.42±5.84 vs 54.88±5.91,P< 0.05),肠易激综合征知识问卷得分较对照组显著升高(23.15±3.82 vs 16.76±4.73,P< 0.05)。 结论 综合护理干预较常规护理干预可提高肠易激综合征患者的治疗效果。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze curative effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Methods From April 2012 to December 2014, 120 patients with irritable bowel syndrome in our hospital were chosen as research objects and they were randomly divided into two groups: observation group (n=60) and control group (n=60). Patients in two groups underwent medication combined with comprehensive nursing intervention and routine nursing, respectively. And they were asked to complete self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale, knowledge questionnaire of irritable bowel syndrome before and 8 weeks after treatment, and their clinical symptoms were collected to observe the curative effect. Results After treatment, the curative effect of observation group was much better than control group (86.67% vs 61.67%, P< 0.05), the anxiety and depression scale score of observation group was significantly lower than control group (42.54±6.04) vs (52.92±6.09), (45.42±5.84) vs (54.88±5.91), P< 0.05. The knowledge questionnaire score of observation group was significantly higher than control group (23.15±3.82) vs (16.76±4.73), P< 0.05. Conclusion Compared with conventional care, comprehensive nursing intervention can improve the curative effect of patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

     

/

返回文章
返回