唐金莉, 荣加. 益生菌在预防老年患者肠内营养相关性腹泻中的应用及护理[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2015, 36(10): 1003-1005. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.011
引用本文: 唐金莉, 荣加. 益生菌在预防老年患者肠内营养相关性腹泻中的应用及护理[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2015, 36(10): 1003-1005. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.011
TANG Jinli, RONG Jia. Probiotics in prevention and care of elderly patients with enteral nutrition-related diarrhea[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2015, 36(10): 1003-1005. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.011
Citation: TANG Jinli, RONG Jia. Probiotics in prevention and care of elderly patients with enteral nutrition-related diarrhea[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2015, 36(10): 1003-1005. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.10.011

益生菌在预防老年患者肠内营养相关性腹泻中的应用及护理

Probiotics in prevention and care of elderly patients with enteral nutrition-related diarrhea

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨益生菌在预防老年患者肠内营养相关性腹泻中的应用与护理。 方法 选取2014年2月- 2015年1月我院消化科需肠内营养的老年患者(年龄60 ~ 82岁)62例,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组31例,行鼻饲肠内营养支持治疗,饲前无腹泻,实验组给予肠内营养剂鼻饲后加用枯草杆菌二联活菌胶囊鼻饲,对照组给单纯肠内营养剂鼻饲,并给予规范化护理。比较两组腹泻发生率、菌群失调情况、肠内营养达到目标供给量的时间。 结果 实验组腹泻的发生率(12.9%)明显低于对照组(12.9% vs 35.5%,χ2=4.31,P< 0.05);实验组肠道菌群失调的发生率明显低于对照组,实验组球菌≥40%的4例(12.9%),对照组球菌≥40%的14例(45.2%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.83,P< 0.01);实验组达到营养目标供给量时间(5.16±0.79) d,明显短于对照组的(9.24±1.12) d(t=16.57,P< 0.01);实验组营养支持治疗时间(10.62±0.74) d,明显短于对照组的(12.56±0.81) d (t=6.99,P< 0.01)。 结论 益生菌在预防老年患者肠内营养相关性腹泻中疗效显著,明显降低患者的腹泻发生率,同时给予规范化护理,可提高肠内营养的成功率。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application of probiotics in the prevention and care of elderly patients with enteral nutritionrelated diarrhea. Methods Sixty-two elderly patients (aged from 60 to 82 years) who needed enteral nutrition were chosen in department of gastroenterology in our hospital from February 2014 to January 2015, and they were randomly divided into experimental group (n=31) and control group (n=31). They were given enteral nutrition therapy without diarrhea before feeding. The patients in experimental group were given Live Combined Bacillus Subtilis and Enterococcus Faecium Enteric-coated Capsules besides nasogastric enteral nutrition, and patients in control group were given nasogastric enteral nutrition. They were both treated and given standardized care for one week. Then the incidence of diarrhea, dysbacteriosis, the goal time of nutritional supply amount were compared. Results The incidence of diarrhea in experimental group (12.9%) was significantly lower than control group (35.5%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.31, P< 0.05). The incidence of intestinal flora in experimental group was significantly lower than control group. The experimental group had 4 patients (12.9%) with cocoas content more than 40% of bacteria, while the control group had 14 patients (45.2%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=7.83, P< 0.01). The treatment in experimental group shortened the goal time of nutritional supply amount and nutritional support time with significant difference (5.16±0.79) d vs (9.42±1.12) d, t=16.57, P< 0.01; (10.62±0.74) d vs (12.56±0.81) d, t=6.99, P< 0.01. Conclusion The efficacy of probiotics in the prevention of enteral nutrition-related diarrhea is remarkable. Probiotics significantly reduces the incidence of diarrhea, and improves the success rate of enteral nutrition with standardization of care at the same time.

     

/

返回文章
返回