林梅燕, 王季堃. 卡培他滨和吉西他滨分别联合卡铂治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌的近期疗效比较[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2016, 37(6): 573-575. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.06.013
引用本文: 林梅燕, 王季堃. 卡培他滨和吉西他滨分别联合卡铂治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌的近期疗效比较[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2016, 37(6): 573-575. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.06.013
LIN Meiyan, WANG Jikun. Comparison of short-term efficacy of capecitabine plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2016, 37(6): 573-575. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.06.013
Citation: LIN Meiyan, WANG Jikun. Comparison of short-term efficacy of capecitabine plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2016, 37(6): 573-575. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.06.013

卡培他滨和吉西他滨分别联合卡铂治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌的近期疗效比较

Comparison of short-term efficacy of capecitabine plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 比较卡培他滨和吉西他滨分别联合卡铂治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌的近期疗效及不良反应。 方法 我院2011年4月-2014年12月经病理及免疫组化证实为三阴性乳腺癌的患者43例,随机分为观察组(卡培他滨联合卡铂组,n=21)和对照组(吉西他滨联合卡铂组,n=22),分别化疗≥2个周期后进行疗效评价并比较两组化疗不良反应。 结果 所有病例均为可评价病例,观察组、对照组有效率分别为61.9%、59.1%;疾病控制率分别为66.7%、68.2%,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。手足综合征的发生率观察组较高,但在骨髓抑制方面优于对照组(P< 0.05)。 结论 卡培他滨联合卡铂方案治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌在疗效上与吉西他滨联合卡铂方案相当,且不良反应少、用药方便,更有利于患者的个体化治疗。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and adverse drug reaction of capecitabine plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods Forty-three TNBC patients who were confirmed by pathology and immunohistochemistry in our hospital from April 2011 to December 2014 were randomly divided into observation group (capecitabine plus carboplatin, n=21) and control group (gemcitabine plus carboplatin, n=22).Patients had undergone chemotherapy for more than 2 cycles.The short-term efficacy and adverse reaction were evaluated and compared between two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) between two groups (61.9% vs 59.1%, 66.7% vs 68.2%, P> 0.05).The incidence of hand-foot syndrome in observation group was significantly higher than control group, but the myelosuppression rate was lower (P< 0.05). Conclusion The effects of capecitabine combined with carboplatin or gemcitabine plus carboplatin on patients with advanced TNBC are equivalent, while capecitabine combined with carboplatin is more fit for advanced TNBC patients with less adverse drug reaction and more convenience in drug administration.

     

/

返回文章
返回