吴纯, 高素荣, 董梅. MicroRNA在辅助诊断系统性红斑狼疮中的价值[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2016, 37(8): 849-852. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.08.009
引用本文: 吴纯, 高素荣, 董梅. MicroRNA在辅助诊断系统性红斑狼疮中的价值[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2016, 37(8): 849-852. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.08.009
WU Chun, GAO Surong, DONG Mei. Role of microRNA in auxiliary diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2016, 37(8): 849-852. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.08.009
Citation: WU Chun, GAO Surong, DONG Mei. Role of microRNA in auxiliary diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2016, 37(8): 849-852. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2016.08.009

MicroRNA在辅助诊断系统性红斑狼疮中的价值

Role of microRNA in auxiliary diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨microRNA-146a在辅助诊断系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)中的价值。 方法 利用免疫印迹法、间接免疫荧光法、茎环RT实时荧光定量PCR(RT-qPCR)检测2014年9月-2015年2月在我院内分泌科住院的33例SLE患者、21例非SLE自身免疫性疾病对照组患者和24例健康体检对照组人血浆中抗可提取性核抗原(extractable nuclear antigen,ENA)、抗核抗体(antinuclear antibody,ANA)和microRNA-146a的表达水平,比较3组间检测指标的差异;SLE患者稳定期与活动期microRNA-146a的表达差异,microRNA-146a与ANA检测水平的相关性。 结果 SLE患者活动期microRNA-146a相对表达量(relative expression,RE)高于稳定期(276.24±255.93 vs 102.76±59.55,P< 0.05);SLE组microRNA-146a的RE为223.67±229.31,高于疾病对照组(10.38±4.49)和正常对照组(4.68±3.18)(P< 0.01),两对照组间差异无统计学意义;microRNA-146a的表达量与ANA滴度无相关性(r=0.043、P=0.801)。 结论 microRNA-146a可以作为一个SLE的潜在诊断标记物,在判断SLE病情的严重程度、监测疾病的发生发展及恢复状况时有参考意义。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the role and clinical value of microRNA-146a in auxiliary diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Western Blot method, indirect immunofluorescence method, stem ring RT real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were used to detect anti-ENA (Extractable Nuclear Antigen), ANA (antinuclear antibody) and microRNA -146a level in plasma of 33 SLE patients, 21 non-SLE patients in disease control group and 24 healthy cases in control group, the differences of detection index between three groups were compared; microRNA-146a expression differences of patients in stable or active stage, and the correlation between detection level of ANA and microRNA-146a were also compared. Results For SLE patients, the relative expression (RE) of microRNA-146a in active subgroup was higher than inactive subgroup (276.24±255.93) vs (102.76±59.55), P< 0.05; and the microRNA-146a RE of SLE group was higher than disease control group and normal control group (223.67±229.31) vs (10.38±4.49), (4.68±3.18), P< 0.01, while there was no statistical difference between two control groups. The correlation coefficient of level of microRNA-146a and ANA was r=0.043, P=0.801. Conclusion microRNA-146a can be used as a potential diagnostic marker of SLE, and it has important value in judging the severity of SLE and monitoring disease onset, development and the status of recovery.

     

/

返回文章
返回