邵龙, 郑娜, 王威, 蒋胶胶, 张家堂. 11例早期误诊为自身免疫性脑炎的胶质瘤患者临床资料分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2017, 38(7): 634-638. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2017.07.011
引用本文: 邵龙, 郑娜, 王威, 蒋胶胶, 张家堂. 11例早期误诊为自身免疫性脑炎的胶质瘤患者临床资料分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2017, 38(7): 634-638. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2017.07.011
SHAO Long, ZHENG Na, WANG Wei, JIANG Jiaojiao, ZHANG Jiatang. Glioma misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis in early stage: An analysis of 11 cases[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2017, 38(7): 634-638. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2017.07.011
Citation: SHAO Long, ZHENG Na, WANG Wei, JIANG Jiaojiao, ZHANG Jiatang. Glioma misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis in early stage: An analysis of 11 cases[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2017, 38(7): 634-638. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2017.07.011

11例早期误诊为自身免疫性脑炎的胶质瘤患者临床资料分析

Glioma misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis in early stage: An analysis of 11 cases

  • 摘要: 目的 分析初诊误诊为自身免疫性脑炎(autoimmune encephalitis,AE)的胶质瘤患者的临床特点,为早期识别胶质瘤提供依据。 方法 选取2011 - 2016年我院收治的早期误诊为AE的胶质瘤患者11例,并选取确诊AE患者13例作为对照,对患者的一般资料、临床症状、病灶部位、脑脊液分析结果、影像学特征及治疗方法进行对比分析。 结果 两组患者的年龄、性别、临床症状及脑脊液分析无明显差异,常规磁共振脑实质单侧或双侧受累、病灶部位是否存在强化无明显差异。磁共振波谱分析(magnetic resonance spectroscopy,MRS)胶质瘤患者NAA峰降低的情况及Cho峰升高较AE患者更为常见和显著,胶质瘤患者的Cho/NAA及Cho/Cr值高于AE患者,差异有统计学意义(P均< 0.01)。胶质瘤患者免疫抑制治疗效果差,AE患者免疫抑制治疗效果较好。 结论 在AE的早期诊断中,特别是在没有获得AE相关抗体筛查结果或结果阴性的情况下,不能仅通过多发病变、病灶无强化排除胶质瘤可能。MRS对胶质瘤与AE的早期鉴别有明确意义,对无法确诊的AE患者建议常规完善MRS检查,当患者对免疫治疗的反应较差时要考虑到胶质瘤的可能。

     

    Abstract: Objective To understand the difference in clinical characteristics between glioma in the early stage and autoimmune encephalitis(AE), and provide basis for differential diagnosis. Methods In the study, 11 cases with glioma who misdiagnosed as AE in the early stage and 13 cases with con firmed AE from 2011 to 2016 in our hospital were enrolled.Their demographic data, clinical manifestation, lesion location, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis results, imaging features and treatment were reviewed and compared. Results There was no signi ficant difference between the two groups in age, gender, clinical symptoms and cerebrospinal fiuid analysis results, and no difference in lesion location, and features of enhancement on MRI.Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)analysis showed decreased NAA peak and increased Cho peak were more common in glioma compared with AE, and the Cho/NAA and Cho/Cr ratios of glioma were signi ficantly higher than those of AE (P< 0.01, respectively).Immunosuppressive therapy was not effective for patients with glioma, but effevtive in patients with AE. Conclusion In the early diagnosis of AE, especially when the antibody screening results are absence or negative, we can't rule out the possibility of glioma only by multiple lesions or no enhancement on MRI.MRS is valuable in early differentiation between glioma and AE.For patients who can not be definitively diagnosed as AE, MRS is recommended for differential diagnosis with glioma.When immunotherapy is not effective, we should consider the possibility of glioma.

     

/

返回文章
返回