孙志佳, 杜楠, 祁楠, 赵辉, 康欢荣, 高洁, 付艳, 刘自豪. 胸腔灌注吉西他滨联合贝伐珠单抗治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2018, 39(4): 275-278. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.04.002
引用本文: 孙志佳, 杜楠, 祁楠, 赵辉, 康欢荣, 高洁, 付艳, 刘自豪. 胸腔灌注吉西他滨联合贝伐珠单抗治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2018, 39(4): 275-278. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.04.002
SUN Zhijia, DU Nan, QI Nan, ZHAO Hui, KANG Huanrong, GAO Jie, FU Yan, LIU Zihao. Efficacy of intrapleural gemcitabine combined with bevacizumab in treatment of malignant pleural effusions[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2018, 39(4): 275-278. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.04.002
Citation: SUN Zhijia, DU Nan, QI Nan, ZHAO Hui, KANG Huanrong, GAO Jie, FU Yan, LIU Zihao. Efficacy of intrapleural gemcitabine combined with bevacizumab in treatment of malignant pleural effusions[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2018, 39(4): 275-278. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.04.002

胸腔灌注吉西他滨联合贝伐珠单抗治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效分析

Efficacy of intrapleural gemcitabine combined with bevacizumab in treatment of malignant pleural effusions

  • 摘要: 目的 观察胸腔灌注吉西他滨联合贝伐珠单抗治疗肺癌胸腔积液的疗效。 方法 选取2016年9月-2017年3月在我科住院治疗的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌伴大量恶性胸腔积液患者48例作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法将其分为两组。在接受吉西他滨1 000 mg/m2(d1、d8)+卡铂400 mg/m2(d1)方案全身化疗的基础上,A组(观察组)给予吉西他滨250 mg/m2+贝伐珠单抗5 mg/kg胸腔灌注治疗;B组(对照组)仅给予吉西他滨250 mg/m2单药胸腔灌注治疗,每3周用药1次,共4周期。观察治疗后两组胸腔积液的变化、药物的不良反应及吉西他滨的药物浓度变化。 结果 两组性别、年龄、吸烟史、肿瘤分期及KPS评分等基线资料差异均无统计学意义。观察组客观有效率高于对照组(83.3% vs 40.9%,P=0.008)。不良反应:观察组血压升高的发生率明显高于对照组(58.3% vs 0,P=0.000);观察组粒细胞减少(58.3% vs 50.0%,P=0.571)、腹泻(16.7% vs 0,P=0.139)发生率略高于对照组,恶心呕吐(29.2% vs 36.4%,P=0.603)、鼻出血(62.5% vs 68.2%,P=0.686)发生率略低于对照组,但差异均无统计学意义。胸腔给药12 h后观察组胸腔中吉西他滨药物浓度明显高于对照组(1.5±0.38 μg/ml vs 1.25±0.16μg/ml,P=0.04),联合给药延长了吉西他滨在胸腔中的停留时间。 结论 胸腔给予贝伐珠单抗联合吉西他滨可以更有效地控制恶性胸腔积液,并延长了吉西他滨的作用时间。

     

    Abstract: Objective To observe the effect of intrapleural gemcitabine combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of pleural effusion of lung cancer. Methods Twenty-eight patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion were enrolled in our study from September 2016 to March 2017. They were divided into two groups according to the random number table method. All patients received systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2 (d1 & d8) plus carboplatin 400 mg/m2 (d1), and then patients in group A (observation group) were treated with intrapleural gemcitabine (250 mg/m2) plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg), while group B (control group) with gemcitabine (250 mg/m2) alone. The treatment was performed for 4 cycles (3 weeks for 1 cycle). The changes of pleural effusion, drug adverse reactions and gemcitabine drug concentration in the two groups were observed after treatment. Results There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, smoking habit, tumor stage and KPS score between the two groups. The objective response rate (ORR) of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group (83.3% vs 40.9%, P=0.008). The incidence of hypertension in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (58.3% vs 0, P=0.000); In the observation group, the incidences of neutropenia (58.3% vs 50.0%, P=0.571) and diarrhea (16.7% vs 0, P=0.139) were slightly higher than those of the control group, while the incidences of nausea and vomiting (29.2% vs 36.4%, P=0.603), epistaxis (62.5% vs 68.2%, P=0.686) were slightly lower than those of control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. After 12 hours of thoracic administration, the concentration of gemcitabine in the chest cavity of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (1.5±0.38μg/ml vs 1.25±0.16μg/ml, P=0.04), which prolonged gemcitabine dwelling time in the thorax. Conclusion Intrapleural bevacizumab combined with gemcitabine can control malignant pleural effusion more effectively, and increase duration of drug action of gemcitabine.

     

/

返回文章
返回