何艳, 王知力, 李亚帅, 张孟珂. 多模态超声在乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2018, 39(10): 838-843. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.10.002
引用本文: 何艳, 王知力, 李亚帅, 张孟珂. 多模态超声在乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2018, 39(10): 838-843. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.10.002
HE Yan, WANG Zhili, LI Yashuai, ZHANG Mengke. Application of multimodality ultrasound in diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2018, 39(10): 838-843. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.10.002
Citation: HE Yan, WANG Zhili, LI Yashuai, ZHANG Mengke. Application of multimodality ultrasound in diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2018, 39(10): 838-843. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.10.002

多模态超声在乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值

Application of multimodality ultrasound in diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨多模态超声在乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值。 方法 纳入2016年3月- 2017年5月本院超声诊断科诊断为BI-RADS 4类的乳腺结节患者118例(118个结节),均为女性,年龄18~70岁。以穿刺或手术病理为金标准,构建ROC曲线,比较常规超声(ultrasound,US)、超声造影(contrast-enhanced ultrasound,CEUS)、弹性成像(shear wave elastic imaging,SWE)及联合诊断的效能。 结果 118例乳腺BI-RADS 4类病变中,病理诊断良性74例(62.7%),恶性44例(37.3%)。常规超声诊断的敏感度为88.6%,特异度为75.7%,阳性预测值0.68,阴性预测值0.92;US结合CEUS的上述指标分别为86.4%、94.6%、0.90、0.92;US结合SWE的上述指标分别为88.6%、90.5%、0.85、0.93。三者相结合,则诊断的敏感度为97.7%,特异度为86.5%,PPV为0.81,NPV为0.98。以多模态超声4a为活检阈值,穿刺活检率由100%可降至40.6%。 结论 多模态超声可提高BI-RADS 4类结节诊断的敏感度和准确度,减少不必要的穿刺活检。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the value of multimodality ultrasound in the diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions. Methods One hundred and eighteen patients with BI-RADS 4 breast lesions in department of ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital from March 2016 to May 2017 were included in our study. All the lesions were confirmed by pathology via surgery or vacuum-assisted biopsy. ROC curve was used to analyze the value of conventional ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS), shear wave elastic imaging (SWE) and multimodal ultrasound in diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 lesions. Results Among the 118 BI-RADS 4 lesions, the pathological results of 74 lesions (62.7%) were benign and 44 lesions (37.3%) were malignant. The sensitivity of conventional ultrasonic diagnosis was 88.6%, the specificity was 75.7%, PPV was 0.68 and NPV was 0.92. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the combined diagnosis by US and CEUS were 86.4%, 94.6%, 0.90, and 0.92 respectively, and they were 88.6%, 90.5%, 0.85 and 0.93, respectively, by combined diagnosis of US and SWE. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of combined diagnosis of US, CEUS and SWE were 97.7%, 86.5%, 0.81 and 0.98, respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive values of combination of three methods were higher than those of single application. Taking 4a as the biopsy threshold, the puncture rate could decrease from 100% to 40.6% after the combined diagnosis of multimodality ultrasound. Conclusion The combined application of US, CEUS and SWE can significantly improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 lesions and reduce the biopsy rate, which is of important clinical significance.

     

/

返回文章
返回