孟宪泽, 辛志俊, 孙擎, 林慧艳, 于海涛, 刘涛, 楚立云, 吕坤聚, 李露嘉. 血清IgM、IgG抗体双阴性2019冠状病毒病患者临床特征分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2020, 41(9): 860-864. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2020.09.003
引用本文: 孟宪泽, 辛志俊, 孙擎, 林慧艳, 于海涛, 刘涛, 楚立云, 吕坤聚, 李露嘉. 血清IgM、IgG抗体双阴性2019冠状病毒病患者临床特征分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2020, 41(9): 860-864. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2020.09.003
MENG Xianze, XIN Zhijun, SUN Qing, LIN Huiyan, YU Haitao, LIU Tao, CHU Liyun, LYU Kunju, LI Lujia. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with negative IgM and IgG[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2020, 41(9): 860-864. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2020.09.003
Citation: MENG Xianze, XIN Zhijun, SUN Qing, LIN Huiyan, YU Haitao, LIU Tao, CHU Liyun, LYU Kunju, LI Lujia. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with negative IgM and IgG[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2020, 41(9): 860-864. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2020.09.003

血清IgM、IgG抗体双阴性2019冠状病毒病患者临床特征分析

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with negative IgM and IgG

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析IgM、IgG抗体双阴性2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的临床特征,并初步探讨IgM、IgG双阴原因。
      方法  回顾性分析2020年3月23日前出院或死亡的湖北省妇幼保健院光谷院区COVID-19患者临床资料,比较双抗阴性(双阴组)和双抗阳性患者(双阳组)的临床特征差异。
      结果  双阴组共计纳入77例,男34例,女43例,平均年龄(62.34±19.69)岁;随机选取双阳组100例,男39例,女61例,平均年龄(59.72±15.48)岁。两组患者性别及年龄无统计学差异(P>0.05);双阴组无明显主诉症状者多于双阳组35.06%(27/77) vs 11.00%(11/100),P=0.000,胸部CT无炎症表现者明显多于双阳组18.18%(14/77) vs 1.00%(1/100),P=0.000;双阴组重危症比例为16.88%(13/77),双阳组为15.00%(15/100),两组临床分型无统计学差异(P=0.447);双阴组死亡率为3.90%(3/77),双阳组为3.00%(3/100),差异无统计学意义(P=0.926)。双阴组从出现症状到行抗体检查的时间明显短于双阳组(25.89±12.70) d vs (35.53±10.59) d,P=0.000。两组间其他临床特征及白细胞计数、超敏C反应蛋白等实验室检验指标无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
      结论  双抗阴性患者可能出现了免疫逃逸现象,因此临床症状及胸部影像学表现相对轻微,但抗体表达与否与COVID-19严重程度及预后无明显相关性。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 cases whose serological antibody IgM and IgG were both negative, and try to find the causes.
      Methods  Clinical data of COVID-19 cases in Guanggu Branch of Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Hubei Province (a COVID-19 designated hospital) who were discharged or deceased before March 23, 2020 were collected, and clinical characteristics between negative IgM and IgG cases (double negative group) and positive IgM and IgG cases (double positive group) were compared and analyzed.
      Results  There were 77 cases in the double negative group, with 34 males and 43 females and an average age of 62.34±19.69 years. Another 100 cases were randomly selected from the double positive group, with 39 males and 61 females and an average age of 59.72±15.48 years. There was no statistically significant difference in sex and age between the two groups (P > 0.05). More asymptomatic cases were found in the double negative group than in the double positive group 35.06% (27/77) vs 11.00% (11/100), P=0.000, and more cases showed a normal chest CT imaging in the double negative group than in the double positive group 18.18% (14/77) vs 1.00% (1/100), P=0.000. The proportion of severe and critically severe cases in the double negative group was 16.88% (13/77), and 15.00% (15/100) in the double positive group, without statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.447). The mortality rate in the double negative group was 3.90% (3/77), and it was 3.00% (3/100) in the double positive group (P=0.926). The duration from the onset of symptoms to the antibody test in the double negative group was significantly shorter than that in the double positive group (25.89±12.70) d vs (35.53±10.59) d, P=0.000. There was no significant difference in the remaining clinical features and laboratory tests like white blood cell count and hypersensitive C-reactive protein between the two groups (all P > 0.05).
      Conclusion  There may be immune escape in IgM and IgG double negative cases. Therefore, the clinical symptoms are relatively mild and the chest imaging is normal. However, the expression of antibody is not significantly related to the severity and prognosis of COVID-19.

     

/

返回文章
返回