高明, 谷伟军, 邹效漫, 吕朝晖, 杨国庆, 金楠, 杜锦, 郭清华, 王先令, 杨丽娟, 巴建明, 母义明, 陆菊明, 窦京涛. 小剂量地塞米松抑制试验对库欣综合征诊断价值探讨[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2012, 33(6): 577-580.
引用本文: 高明, 谷伟军, 邹效漫, 吕朝晖, 杨国庆, 金楠, 杜锦, 郭清华, 王先令, 杨丽娟, 巴建明, 母义明, 陆菊明, 窦京涛. 小剂量地塞米松抑制试验对库欣综合征诊断价值探讨[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2012, 33(6): 577-580.
GAO Ming, GU Wei-jun, ZOU Xiao-man, LU: Chao-hui, YANG Guo-qing, JIN Nan, DU Jin, GUO Qing-hua, WANG Xian-ling, YANG Li-juan, BA Jian-ming, MU Yi-ming, LU Ju-ming, DOU Jing-tao. Value of low dose dexamethasone suppression test for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2012, 33(6): 577-580.
Citation: GAO Ming, GU Wei-jun, ZOU Xiao-man, LU: Chao-hui, YANG Guo-qing, JIN Nan, DU Jin, GUO Qing-hua, WANG Xian-ling, YANG Li-juan, BA Jian-ming, MU Yi-ming, LU Ju-ming, DOU Jing-tao. Value of low dose dexamethasone suppression test for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome[J]. ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF CHINESE PLA MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2012, 33(6): 577-580.

小剂量地塞米松抑制试验对库欣综合征诊断价值探讨

Value of low dose dexamethasone suppression test for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome

  • 摘要: 目的 评价小剂量地塞米松抑制试验(LDDST)对库欣综合征(CS)的诊断价值,探讨LDDST的最佳诊断指标和诊断切点。 方法 回顾性分析1991-2011年本院内分泌科收治并确诊的285例库欣综合征患者的临床资料,同时收集146例临床怀疑后经试验排除库欣综合征患者的临床资料。分别以血、尿皮质醇的绝对值和抑制率作为LDDST的诊断指标,通过各项指标的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)比较得出LDDST最佳诊断指标,同时计算敏感性与特异性之和最大的试验切点。 结果 285例术后病理学检查证实的库欣综合征患者,其中库欣病154例(54%),肾上腺皮质腺瘤96例(33.7%),非ACTH依赖性双侧肾上腺大结节增生16例(5.6%),异位促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)综合征14例(4.9%),肾上腺皮质癌3例(1.05%),异位肾上腺皮质腺瘤1例(0.35%),原发性色素性结节性肾上腺增生不良1例(0.35%)。146例排除库欣综合征患者诊断包括单纯性肥胖、原发性高血压、多囊卵巢综合征、血糖调节受损、高胰岛素血症、继发性闭经等。LDDST以抑制后血清皮质醇为诊断指标ROC曲线下面积最大,为0.971,诊断价值最高。抑制后血清皮质醇以146.5nmol/L(5.3μg/dl)为切点时敏感性97%,特异性98.9%;以美国内分泌协会临床指南推荐50nmol/L(1.8μg/dl)为切点的敏感性99.6%,特异性89%。 结论 LDDST诊断库欣综合征以抑制后血清皮质醇为诊断指标价值最大,以抑制后血清皮质醇146.5nmol/L(5.3μg/dl)为切点试验的敏感性与特异性之和最大,推荐为最佳诊断切点。以50nmol/L(1.8μg/dl)为切点则试验敏感性提高,特异性降低。

     

    Abstract: Objective To assess the value of low dose dexamethasone suppression test(LDDST) for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and study the best diagnostic indications and cut-off value of LDDST. Methods Clinical data about 285 patients with Cushing’s syndrome and 146 patients without Cushing’s syndrome admitted to our department from 1991 to 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.Absolute serum and urocortisol level and inhibition rate were used as the diagnostic indications for Cushing’s syndrome.The best diagnostic indications for LDDST were obtained by comparing area under ROC curve(AUC) and calculating the best cut-off value,sensitivity and specificity of LDDST. Results Of the 285 patients with Cushing’s syndrome,154(54%),96(33.7%),16(5.6%),14(4.9%),3(1.05%),1(0.35%),and 1(0.35%) were diagnosed with Cushing’s disease,adrenal adenoma,AIMAH,ectopic ACTH syndrome,adrenal carcinoma,ectopic adrenal adenoma,and PPNAD,respectively.The 146 patients without Cushing’s syndrome were diagnosed with obesity,primary hypertension,PCOS,diabetes mellitus,insulin resistance and secondary amenorrhea,etc.Serum cortisol level was used as an indication for LDDST.The diagnostic value of AUC was the highest when the maximum AUC was 0.971.The sensitivity and specificity of LDDST were 97% and 98.9% respectively when the serum cortisol level was 146.5nmol/L(5.3μg/dl),and 99.6% and 89% respectively when the serum cortisol level was 50nmol/L(1.8μg/dl) recommended by American Endocrinology Society Clinical Guideline(AESCG). Conclusion The best indication for LDDST in diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is the serum cortisol level.The sensitivity and specificity of LDDST are the highest when the best cutoff value of serum cortisol level is 146.5nmol/L(5.3μg/dl).The sensitivity of LDDST is higher while the specificity of LDDST is lower when the best cutoff value of serum cortisol level is 50nmol/L(1.8μg/dl).

     

/

返回文章
返回